Archived The anti-Voat brigade appears to be in full swing over at /r/Voat (reddit.com)
submitted ago by Partoghimeos
Posted by: Partoghimeos
Posting time: 5.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 4116
SCP: 192
194 upvotes, 2 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
Archived The anti-Voat brigade appears to be in full swing over at /r/Voat (reddit.com)
submitted ago by Partoghimeos
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Norm 2 points 29 points 31 points (+31|-2) ago
plus you can easily block subs that you don't like anyways, so it's easy to avoid anything you don't want to see.
[–] TommyW 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Yeah, but I know what CamelBeard means. I see SJW stuff in v/videos comments even when the video has absolutely nothing to do with SJW stuff. Take this one I replied to for example. Video is about poking a peacock in the butt and getting a reaction? Well, that's a clear conversation starter about trigger warnings.
[–] KrabsOnSecurity 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
They're all over the internet. It's aggressive propaganda/hive mind stuff. You raise grief before something has even happened and it applies some sort of social pressure to prevent it from happening in the first place.
They're making SJW feel the heat even when they are not SJW-ing. Manipulative behavior but effective.
[–] CamelBeard 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yes you got exactly what I meant. Like right now there is an IAMA about a guy who made LSD. But because he wrote something for vice people make it about SJW, because vice...
[–] WeAllVoatDownHere 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The problem I'm starting to worry about with blocking subs is it means no one is downvoting content that isn't of value to the site and that means for people who come to Voat without an account or who don't subscribe/block specific subverses get a front page of content that has been heavily upvoted by it's niche supporters but received hardly any downvotes from the rest of the Voat community.