[–] ImPhilippe 2 points 95 points (+97|-2) ago 

YOU INVITE THE BABY IN BY HAVING INTERCOURSE YOU FILTH WHORE

[–] Muh-Shugana 0 points 56 points (+56|-0) ago 

>inviting someone in to kill them

Looks like we've got them on premeditated murder!

Book 'em, Sam.

[–] 1HepCat 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

This is why anti-abortion laws often have exceptions for cases of rape--because in those cases the woman did not consent to having a child placed inside of her. An even more understandable exception is for cases where the mother's life is threatened by the unborn child such as ectopic pregnancy.

[–] SuperSaiyanCock 1 points 26 points (+27|-1) ago 

As someone else mentioned, the percentage of these cases is extremely low and as for ectopic pregnancies or those that threaten the mother's physical life, it's the doctor's duty to prioritize the mother's life in most cases.

Those are just pointless arguments that abortion supporters bring to the forefront in order to justify the murder of millions of otherwise perfectly fine unborn babies each year.

[–] FormerBaltimoreRes 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

I WAS RAPED AND NOW I AM PREGNANT

Oh no, someone attacked you?

No it was my boyfriend but I regretted it afterwards now please dilate my cervix and decapitate my baby, I'm so empowered!

[–] Simonsaysgoat 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Thats still an enormously small percentage

[–] MrDarkWater 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago 

Fuck those exceptions

[–] SpeshulSnowflaek 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Damn I thought she had a point until you said this. The baby isn't trespassing, it was invited.

Good rebuttal

[–] the_hidden_metric 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I weep for your ability to reason on your own if you actually thought there was a good point there for a second and had to come to comments for a rebuttal. Like, really???

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

YOU INVITE THE BABY IN BY HAVING INTERCOURSE YOU FILTH WHORE

But but but, what about extreme and rare edge cases like rape babies? If they can kill their children then why can't I? /s

[–] Helbrecht 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago 

Or are guns less deadly than abortions?

Welllllllllllll ACKCHUALLY

[–] pixelkitteh 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

^ I thought the same thing. They are literally so stupid that the words just fall out it seems.

[–] Longstride77 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Reddit users have lost their grip on reality. It might not even be genuine people at this point. Just out sourced shilling from other countries to sow divide.

[–] andrew_jackson 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'll preface what I'm about to say by pointing out that I try to stay completely out of the abortion argument, because I think both sides are stupid...

 

....but every time I see some feminists trying to make abortion into a "Women's Issue," merely emphasizes to me how stupid feminists are. If they're portraying it as a moral issue, oughtn't both genders to have an opinion on it, or is it their goal to be sexist?

[–] SuperSaiyanCock 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Could you imagine if over 1 million baby murder/homicides with guns occurred each year?

Yet women voluntarily end the life of that many babies each year and no one bats an eye.

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It really depends, are we looking and negro or white data?

Blacks kill more babies than they shoot people.

[–] man_with_titties 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Stand your ground doesn't allow you to invite someone onto your property and then kill them. The baby has an implicit 9 month tenancy agreement.

[–] Korinthian 1 points 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

This is why women dont get political opinions.

[–] zxcvzxcv 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Except that they do get political opinions. Fricken kikes!

[–] newoldwave 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

If the baby has a gun and threatening you, then it's OK to kill it.

[–] GetWoke 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Babies are not cognizant of the firearm, maybe you should just take the gun away and give baby it's pacifier

[–] zxcvzxcv 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Would it make a difference if the baby is a time-traveler?

[–] ShitPostMcGee 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Has anyone ever shot a baby that wandered onto their property and successfully defended themselves in court using stand your ground?

[–] goatmensch 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Because infanticide is not self defense.

Let's see if these women can wrap their heads around that one.

[–] YamaMaya 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Abortions kill someone 100% of the time and sometimes they kill the mother too. More babies have been killed in the US than the so called "Holocaust" yet they refuse to call it genocide.

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Nothing is genocide except the 600 gbrizillion. Never forget that.

[–] ThirteenthZodiac 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

If you want to go lolbertarian, you can argue that the infant is violating the NAP by occupying the womb.

load more comments ▼ (29 remaining)