You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
5

[–] Rommel79 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Couldn't Conde Nast potentially sue the hell out of Reddit for this?

0
1

[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If you really thought you could prove by a preponderance of the evidence that this was an intentional scheme, then yeah, there are various potential claims you could assert against Altman and Ohanian. But such claims would be exceedingly difficult to prove. Chances are unless you really had smoking gun evidence of collusion and breach of duties (both the general business duty of fair dealing and specific fiduciary duties (duty of care and duty of loyalty seem most at issue) as board members and/or execs) it would not be worth the cost of suing.

0
0

[–] BigSwami 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You could flip a participant and have them testify, but that's still not physical evidence.

0
0

[–] Nobodyimportant 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Questions of that nature are posted in the thread. Yishan addresses them.

0
0

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I think so, but I don't really know much about lawsuits and defrauded share holders.