Archived /r/ShitRedditSays moderator /u/Dworkinator admits to the Voat takedown (web.archive.org)
submitted ago by ey-b0ss
Posted by: ey-b0ss
Posting time: 5.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 3822
SCP: 137
140 upvotes, 3 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
Archived /r/ShitRedditSays moderator /u/Dworkinator admits to the Voat takedown (web.archive.org)
submitted ago by ey-b0ss
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 1smartass ago (edited ago)
jail·bait
A female young enough that doing something sexual with her would land you in jail.
By definition, it doesn't mean 18, it could mean 9 years old, and you're arguing that it should exist as a site on Voat or Reddit, so speaking of absurd arguments.
[–] FFX01 ago
Why are you applying morality to the issue? This isn't about morality. A lot of people seem to think this is a moral issue. It's not. Stop treating it like one. Regardless if I think it's wrong or not, as long as it isn't hurting one, I see no problems.
[–] 1smartass ago
I'm amazed this is coming from someone who invoked reductio ad absurdium as a counter argument. You're literally arguing that sex doesn't involve morals, even sex with someone of an age that would be illegal.
You're literally saying sex with a 9 year old wouldn't involve morals.
Even with your silly argument that it's just a silly name for a harmless subsite, well all it takes is one creep, one activist trying to make a point, and no moderators around, and you have a business killing incident on your hands.
Ask for that kind of trouble when you're at the helm of a website or website host.