This is a moderated community.
The goal is to encourage people to approach mathematics in a fashion that makes it accessible. In order to do this, we're going to need a few basic rules.
- Try to be on topic.
- Be civil.
- No drama.
Pretty simple, huh? Yeah... I reduced them to the lowest common denominator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Off-topic is tolerated to some extent. Submissions should all be about mathematics, or clearly relate to mathematics. However, once you get into the comments section, it's a much looser standard. Discourse is encouraged, so long as civility is maintained. Good conversations tend to meander around topics and that's perfectly acceptable.
If you do vote, concentrate on promoting content and not downvoting content. Encourage and comment, if you see something that could use improvement. Downvotes don't convey very much information and aren't really helpful. If you must, you must... But try to assume the person making the post was just communicating poorly. Try to assume the best possible interpretation of their post.
Some terms:
- WDT Weekly Discussion Thread
Greek Alphabet:
Α α, Β β, Γ γ, Δ δ, Ε ε, Ζ ζ, Η η, Θ θ, Ι ι, Κ κ, Λ λ, Μ μ, Ν ν, Ξ ξ, Ο ο, Π π, Ρ ρ, Σ σ/ς, Τ τ, Υ υ, Φ φ, Χ χ, Ψ ψ, Ω ω
Hebrew Alphabet:
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ/ך ל מ/ם נ/ן ס ע פ/ף צ/ץ ק ר ש ת
Other common symbols:
¬ → ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∂ ∃ ∅ ∇ ∈ ∉ √ ∞ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⊕ ∫ ≈ ≠ ≡ ≤ ≥ ⊆ ⊂ ⊃ ⊄ ° ± · × ⟌ ÷ ⌊ ⌋ ⌈ ⌉ ➀ ℤ ℕ ℙ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℍ ℭ
If you're interested in academia, you can feel free to also join us at v/PrincipiaAcademia where we discuss all things academic.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Shekelstein6M 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
"As Ibn Khaldun, the fourteenth-century Arab historiographer and sociologist suggests, it is a remarkable fact that with few exceptions, most Muslim scholars in the intellectual sciences were Ajams ("Persians"):"
Now you can do more of your own research, if you want to actually question your own beliefs.
[–] TheBuddha [S] 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
Allow me to quote your statement with which I have objection (and which your own quote confirms my statements):
So, I need only point to one example to demonstrate that as untrue. You've been kind enough to do that for me.
Here was your initial statement:
Which, now demonstrably false if we accept your statement at full value.
If we view my initial statement, it was that a goodly amount of our mathematics came from Arabia - which remains true. Much of this was done (and advanced) while under the empire.
I'm NOT saying that it was a panacea - and, to go back to my original statement, I am saying they were pretty good stewards. Indeed, they were.
There's seemingly some miscommunication here. I will try to make it more clear.
Math and science did pretty well under the Arabic empires (there were several disputing empires and some strange history). Some of this advancement was done by people of Arabic decent. Some of it was done by people who practiced the Muslim faith. All in all, they did pretty well with it.
They were not the apex of knowledge. They were not some glorious scholars who lived an idyllic life of higher learning. They had wonderful centers of knowledge and preserved much of the older bodies of work which some scholars give partial credit for the enlightenment.
This is pretty clearly established stuff.
[–] Shekelstein6M 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
It's actually demonstrably true. The Islamic golden age coincided with the largest extent of the islamic caliphate. Not including the ottomans, their scientific advancements slowed down and essentially stopped by the time they started losing territory.
The ottomans lasted longer, because they came later and conquered Constantinople. But after they stopped conquering they fell behind very quickly and in a mater of decades were no longer competitive.
Most of it comes from Persia actually. Your own wiki link has mostly Persians in there. Arabs mostly didn't invent shit, apart from what they could steal and claim as their own.
Most of "arabic knowledge" came from people hailing from the Scythian and Roman (Byzantine) Empires. No one can say for certain what their religion was (to represent oneself as anything but a muslim in those times was a bad idea) but they certainly were not mostly arabs.
Furthermore, we do not know how many slaves captured by the arabs were actually intellectuals, and how much of their knowledge was stolen and claimed as their own by their masters.
What I do know, through my own research of history, is how muslims operated at the time, and how the places they conquered looked before and after. To me, it's very easy to see why their "golden age" ended when it did.