Posted by: fricknmaniac
Posting time: 4.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 252
SCP: 7
14 upvotes, 7 downvotes (67% upvoted it)
~2 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] fricknmaniac [S] ago
You're absolutely right as far as social issues, but Hillary is totally in the pockets of corporations and so every single economic policy she pushes will just benefit corporations and not people. Combine that with her support of mass government surveillance and I'm done with Hillary before you get to anything criminal she's done.
[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It's pretty much guaranteed that any regulation will be coopted, it's only a matter of time. I agree it would be sooner rather than latter with Hillary though.
Well, that's not entirely unlike sanders either: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/27/politics/bernie-sanders-isis-surveillance/index.html
Although, admittedly, he also said stuff about weakening surveillance, which is a bit confusing.