You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] YoungerX 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Removing the line was an attempt at damage control, as was the admission that the trans character was not written well. I can only conclude the game has not been selling as well as they expected.

Weren't the complaints about the line mostly to do with it being out of character? I still think this would have been a very minor incident if that writer had not said she inserted SJW stuff into games, she didn't care if it seemed forced and it was tough if gamers didn't like it.

Also I don't buy the argument about being "no better than the SJW's", it is not their tactics that make me oppose them but their ideology.

0
2

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

she didn't care if it seemed forced and it was tough if gamers didn't like it.

this is the problem right here.

At the end of the day, regardless of what you think, a game is a product. The gamers are the customers. In this incident, beamdog has demonstrated that they are of the same mentality as EA. the problem, is that EA has access to more money, and better licenses then beamdog.

I have been noticing a trend with these sjw devs: they suck at programming, business, and game design. they have had to rely on putting political messages in their games, rather then on the content of their product.