jesus christ, are we ALL turning into touchy little bitches?
my post was removed for violating rule 3 - in bad faith. but it is completely NOT in bad faith. and what's worse, the moderator removed the post within SECONDS of it being posted - telling me that the mod DIDN'T EVEN READ IT and was just triggered by the title?
ffs, at least i titled the post correctly:
LYNCHABLE THOUGHT OF THE DAY - Why is the message - "Don't rape women"?
for strong, empowered, intelligent women with agency, why isn't the message, "DON'T GET RAPED"?
why is the message aimed at men rather than at women?
these SJW fundamentalist bastions of intellect bitch incessantly about being objectified by men but in their own messaging about rape, they make THEMSELVES helpless OBJECTS who are subject to the whims of men and whose safety and very existence depend on the mercy and good graces of men??
for fuck's sake, how are they this disconnected to rational thought nevermind strategic propaganda?
if i was a woman and i really believed that 9 out 7 women in america are raped every minute or that every second, 15 out of 12 college women are sodomized and 29 out of 16 women gave handjobs without their consent as they claim... jesus fucking christ, i would be fucking armed to the goddamn motherfucking TEETH when i left the house... which would be FUCKING RARELY and only in cases of extreme need! not only that, i would develop a buddy system second only to the fucking navy seals with hard, crack hitting lesbians sweeping every corner and fucking pink haired snipers covering my every move.
why, in their messaging, do they surrender their own agency to lay it at the feet of men?
especially from their point of view - there are feminazis that believe that women are in NO WAY the less of men in terms of physical prowess and capability. they claim that the only difference is that men developed themselves to be stronger while women choose otherwise... which is a fucking bald faced lie that denies science as much as any creationist (not to mention just their own fucking eyes in their own fucking skulls)... but even if we accept that - then wouldn't the fault of all these women getting raped be at the feet of the raped? that they didn't muscle the fuck up to stand against these LEGIONS and WAVES of rapists on their own two feet?
if they know the threat and are capable (EMPOWERED!) to resist, well why the fuck are they all shirking their duty to themselves and the sisterhood? where are the shera bodybuilding groups? where are the lipstick pistol whipping chicks? where are the pink nunchucku training centers?
where is their ACCOUNTABILITY? where is the AGENCY? where is the STRENGTH and POWER that they claim at almost any and every other time....
but when it comes to sexual violence, the message is no more developed than, "please, don't hurt me" ?
my take - they didn't think too hard about this.
rape is indeed a societal problem that, when divorced from the wacky stats of the gender studies fundys that make out the campus of MIT the equivalent of downtown fucking somalia, needs to be dealt with seriously.
in this sober view, there has been a lot of messaging to men that rape is wrong and must not be countenanced... with the understanding that MEN ARE INDEED PHYSICALLY STRONGER AND LARGER and can coerce women who are weaker and smaller.
that message makes sense to me. that message makes sense to the sane and rational.
but the rad fem nutballs took this without really working out how this meshes with their core positions (surprise - it does not).
they thought - "oooo, something we can demonize men with!" without thinking about the logical inferences such messaging creates.
fucking idiots.
Sort: Top
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] BrickDick 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
My guess as to why it was removed is that it has little to do with the topicality of the sub. My latest tips on spark plug replacement or photos of my dog would likely receive the same treatment.
[–] GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
even though there are half a dozen other posts on issues like campus rape and the mizzou kerfuffle that also document sjw fuckery on the KiA front page, they could have made that argument. but they didn't. they said it was in bad faith. when it is clear to anyone reading it that it is not.
[–] GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy [S] 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago (edited ago)
that's fucking libelous you idiot cunt. out of all my posts, how many are concerned with rape?
how can you seriously say that of all the kinds of posts that i make that i'm "awfully focused on rape" or that it can be construed a parody account? are you fucking joking or are you really a moron? honestly, i want to know which.
also, what about that post indicates that it is being posted in bad faith and that i'm not genuine? what would you even disagree with in terms of the content of that post?
i've always known that groups are fucked up. that sooner or later KiA would be just as corrupted and touchy faggy as ghazi... just didn't think it would happen this fucking fast.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] Inverse 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is not how you gain support for your views and leads to bitchy posts in other subs about how we didn't like you and you don't know what you did wrong.
[–] Kleyno 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
I like to think of rape and robbery as the same thing.
In both instances, you have something the other person wants, but you don't know when, how, or where they are going to strike.
The police, at least in my country, bombard us with advice and adverts aiming at taking precautions with our possessions. Don't walk around at night with your phone out. Get an alarm system. Lock up your front and back doors. Don't keep your car keys in view of a window, or letter box.
We don't focus our attention on the thieves, because we know it is pointless trying to teach them to stop stealing. Instead, we focus attention on the victims, to make it harder for the thieves to rob them.
The same attitude should be adopted for rape prevention, by teaching women how to make themselves less of an easy target, and how to defend themselves, in the event that they are targeted.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Victim blaming, aka I shouldnt have to do things because doing things is hard.
[–] GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
people say "victim blaming" as if it means something.
we blame victims all the fucking time. "i was counting my money in the bad side of town at midnight and i got mugged!" "well what the fuck were you doing that for you fucking imbecile?!"
no amount of stupidity JUSTIFIES crimes perpetrated against them.
but we can and should still say that stupid people bring upon disaster to themselves by doing stupid things. don't want to get robbed? lock the fucking door.
[–] GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
exactly my point. why that is construed as controversial, i have no fucking idea.