You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] SmokeyMeadow 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Could it be whores? That would fit the right number of asterisks, which seems consistent throughout the article. But saying whores isn't really even cussing. Dailymail readers must be pretty easily offended, that guy's profile has more redactions than a FOIA request about Area 51.

0
0

[–] Annelise ago 

I think DailyMail readers are probably on par with NY Daily News readers.

0
0

[–] tanukihat ago 

Ahh, whores. That fits. You can say "fuck" on TV now but god help you if you use a derogatory term for women.

0
1

[–] SmokeyMeadow 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

women

LOL. They might have masked half his profile, but I'm willing to bet this guy never used that word in relation to an actual woman. Maybe a mentally ill man who thinks it's a woman, but that's a whole other ballgame.