want to join the discussion? or register in seconds.
sort by:
New Bottom Intensity Old

Sort: Top

[–] ProudEuropean88 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I think one positive development of the post-Charlottesville Shoah will be that we create an entire self-reliant social infrastructure for Alt-Right purposes. But it will take some time.

[–] solar_flare 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Don't just build echo chambers, they won't appeal to the masses. If you label a website or platform as alt-right, conservative, whatever, that's the only people you'll get.

[–] Crimen 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You're going to have to make outlets that compete with the heavyweights then. Doing that with the express purpose of redpilling normies might be difficult.

[–] Crimen 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

will be that we create an entire self-reliant social infrastructure for Alt-Right purposes.

Point to examples?

[–] Drop_Nukes_On_Israel 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Gab.ai for an intermediary

https://blockstack.org/ - long term development of a decentralized internet to prevent no-platforming like what happened to Anglin, however it'll be ages before this kicks off. This one is promising because it's getting investor funding from one of the original Twitter guys. It's an attempt to put the blockchain directly into the Internet.

1 reply

[–] Precipitate 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

Except they're not. Sure they're fags, but they have the right to be. Don't go all libtard just because you don't get your way. The only good course of action is for the right to create our own platforms.

[–] Bryntyr 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Morale high ground bullshit, sue them back, foist them by their own petard. They sued christian bakeries for refusing service to queers, we can sue them for discrimination too.

[–] Crimen 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Show me which states have special provisions for the protection of political beliefs.

Currently Masterpiece v. Colorado is pending in the SCOTUS. Technically, the bakers violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) which includes:

It is a discriminatory practice and unlawful for a person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from, or deny to an individual or a group, because of . . . sexual orientation . . . the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation . . . .5

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-111-op-bel-colo-app.pdf

Courts sided with the plaintiffs. CSC upheld the decision, and we'll get a decision next year by SCOTUS.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/8/8/16113076/google-memo-firing

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9154066

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/11/25/can-businesses-refuse-to-serve-or-employ-trump-supporters/?utm_term=.251a80b92381

I don't think we have a strong leg to stand on. You might want to check if google takes any federal dollars; if it does, it'll be under certain restrictions that might help.

Also, look into specific state laws regarding social media's denial of platform for speech they don't like. Again though, it doesn't look like you have a strong leg to stand on.

[–] ragnnohab 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Though if a lawyer did come forward as actually being in favor of our cause they probably stand to make a good bit of shekels.

[–] Crimen 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Or lose a good bit of shekels.

[–] solar_flare 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Well first of all you wouldn't want to label it White Nationalist Law Coalition since that's very exclusive, and unwelcoming to many people that would agree with the premise and support such a thing. 'White Nationalists' aren't the only ones being discriminated against, by far.

[–] Crimen 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Their behavior is illegal discriminatory intimidation, harassment, etc.

How so?

[–] Bryntyr 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

you cannot deny someone service based on sex, race, religion, or creed. Creed being philosophy

[–] Crimen 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Creed doesn't seem to be a protected class.