You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] SweetChicken 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That's because lefties don't understand the difference between a pure democracy, which we are not and a democratic republic which we are. You are trying to imply they mean a pure democracy when they are talking about a republican democracy.

Journalist John L. O'Sullivan, an influential advocate for Jacksonian democracy and a complex character described by Julian Hawthorne as "always full of grand and world-embracing schemes",[13] wrote an article in 1839,[14] which, while not using the term "manifest destiny", did predict a "divine destiny" for the United States based upon values such as equality, rights of conscience, and personal enfranchisement "to establish on earth the moral dignity and salvation of man". This destiny was not explicitly territorial, but O'Sullivan predicted that the United States would be one of a "Union of many Republics" sharing those values.[15]

Six years later, in 1845, O'Sullivan wrote another essay titled Annexation in the Democratic Review,[16] in which he first used the phrase manifest destiny.[17] In this article he urged the U.S. to annex the Republic of Texas,[18] not only because Texas desired this, but because it was "our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions".[19] Overcoming Whig opposition, Democrats annexed Texas in 1845. O'Sullivan's first usage of the phrase "manifest destiny" attracted little attention.[20]

Edit; I'm just trying to point out manifest destiny was born out of the thought that our republics core values are what deemed it 'morally right' for the expansionist ideology.

0
1

[–] 9923548? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So ok

How do we "get rid of the non whites" in that context ? How do we fix the population replacement by mass immigration and sheer demographic numbers ?

Democratically ?

I shit on democracy, as a whole

I'm for a dictatorial transition, now when the ethno shit gets fixed maybe it will be a good idea to put democracy back, with a constitutional provision forbidding immigration of non whites, or immigration entirely, for good measure, so we don't have to dive into that shit every 50 years or so because of a bunch of fucktarded care bears

0
1

[–] SweetChicken 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm not sure of the solution. I believe the primary reason we are in this predicament is due to the subversion of the original document. I say empty the swamp and then roll it back to square one.

How can we achieve this? You may be right that a dictatorial period may need to occur. I am not necessarily for it but I enjoy exploring the possibilities. So +1 for spurring conversation and deep thoughts. :)