You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] parscion 2 points 29 points (+31|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Emily is great, but she should make a version of it that tones down some things to make it more palatable for normies. For example, no 1488, swastica, community discussion shouldn't be about the JQ, making a woman feel like she has to stay at home, etc.

Also the buildings in the first panel should be a bit better than generic globalist crap.


[–] smokratez 1 points 25 points (+26|-1) ago 

making a woman feel like she has to stay at home

The greatest accomplishment in the life of a woman is to be a mother. She doesn't have to stay home, she should want to.


[–] Asetro1234 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

While i completely agree with this, we have to be pragmatic. If we are to spread this, it needs to be acceptable in the minds of the normies. Right now, the SJWs are taking a big hit, so we have the chance to push it more in our direction. We just have to push slowly. Too fast and we look like SJWs.


[–] Torkimadi 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

Why shouldn't women stay home? Running a home, caring for a baby, being involved in my community takes up all my time. If I had to work I'd hang myself. I don't get to sleep and half the time don't get to eat already, so what effing douchebag is going to make me work?

It's pretty demented to whine that women should be at home. How many kids are you raising with a job?


[–] parscion 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

There's no doubt that's the best environment for children. My point was making it more palatable for normies. If you make someone think you're reducing their choice they'll reject you. What trad offers them is freedom, but they won't see it initially.


[–] IAMA_WhiteMale_AMA 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Everyone needs to feel purpose (useful and needed) and secure. Traditionally, women were homemakers while men sought resources. But things change. Only one paycheck is no longer secure to even having a home let alone affording a family. So women entering the workforce is now how women get their purpose and security.

It's one of the reasons women have always dated "up" socioeconomically, even before the discovery of fire. Even animals do it. But these days, since the 1950s at least, with the way society and economy are, "up" isn't good enough, unless that Walmart cashier can land a guy making 200k a year, which is unlikely and weeds out 95% of men. The whole reason the "incel" and "black pill" stuff exists is because most men are not "up" enough to even warrant a second date from a woman, let alone a wife.

That woman who just wants to be a good mom and homemaker is at a disadvantage at finding a partner able to make it happen. Women with good careers still don't want to date down, even if they could. Men are insecure in such relationships too in the rare times they happen, as they also need to feel purpose, through providing since we can't be moms. The insecurity is also due to the fact that the majority of divorces are initiated by women for financial reasons.

I don't know the solution. Men can't just claim a plot of land and build a home like they used to. These days, it takes a decade of saving every penny just to get that far. Still gonna be house poor without a frugal homesteader lifestyle, which very few modern women would be happy with.

Tl;Dr - Women turned away from homemaking because men can't provide like they used to. They needed purpose, and found it in the workforce.


[–] shadow332 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago