0
34

[–] brigbother 0 points 34 points (+34|-0) ago 

Hello Dr. MacDonald.

How can we foster honest conversations about Jewish behavior without causing people to immediately be turned off?

0
49

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 49 points (+49|-0) ago 

It's very difficult. People's eyes tend to glaze over when the subject is broached. And the problem is that it takes a real commitment to get into it. You can't give a decent argument with sound bites. It takes some serious reading. Dealing with Jewish issues is often the last hurdle for many in the Alt Right. In a way, it's not necessary to talk about Jews to get at the core issue of White identity, but I do think that without talking about Jews you really can't understand how we got to where we are now.

0
9

[–] brigbother 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thank you.

I have definitely been subjected to the glazed eyes treatment when I've brought it up with people. You are right, it takes serious study to understand the JQ. My problem is that people are eager to change the subject and forget about it.

Any tips on inspiring people's curiosity so that they do seek out serious reading?

0
15

[–] smokratez 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Tell people that you like what the jews are doing. How you admire their closed borders. How they build a wall. That they are serious about trying to abolish miscegenation. That they oppose diversity and multiculturalism. I say that all I want for my country is what jews have in Isreal, and I mean it.

1
18

[–] TheDeadHand 1 point 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

What do you think the future of America is for whites? I know you don't have a crystal ball but what is your best guess as to what sort of life my grandchildren will have as white people in America? Is it still too soon to tell? If so what is the most practical thing we can do on an individual level to make sure our children and grandchildren have a bright future? Hope this question isn't too broad. Thank you for your time.

Also if anyone would like to join our discord server at https://discord.gg/D2Mq3te then you're more than welcome to. We promote ethnonationalism and traditional family values, as well as discussing politics and other such things.

0
20

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Of course, I am deeply worried about our future. I see a future when Whites will be a despised, persecuted minority unless things are turned around. I also see a highly racialized world where voting patterns and associational patterns more and more determined by race. I commend you for having a site dedicated to ethnonationalism and traditional family values, and I mentioned TrueCascadia previously. We have to each make decisions to make our personal, family lives adaptive (e.g., by having children) but also think what we can do for the movement. Everyone can do something. We have to think about how we can make a contribution to the wider movement.

0
12

[–] bhendri123 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

We definitely need to have children. 3 is a good middle class amount to have. If you have well off 4 or 5 is a good number

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] ViceRoy 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Got any tips on starting your own business. Id love to but I have no idea how to even start one, nevermind run one.

0
0

[–] Ajaxofbarbaria ago 

Thank you for the link. My life just got a whole lot brighter after the interview :D

0
14

[–] Disemboweled 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Considering that even scholarly work focusing on jewish influence such as yours is derided as anti-semitic, and that the ADL, instead of offering a serious rebuttal prefers to brand you as "neo-nazi's favorite academic", what is the likelihood of there ever being a healthy dialogue in the west about the Jewish Question?

0
21

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Glad you phrased that the way you did. The ADL and the SPLC, etc. resort to labels without any serious attempt to rebut my arguments and the things I cite (hundreds of Jewish sources, e.g.). I suppose what could happen is that my work is somehow mentioned by a person prominent in the media, but I rather doubt this would happen. And even if it did, it would not provoke a real dialog. In short, not optimistic.

0
3

[–] Disemboweled 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

not optimistic I agree. The lack of discussion in this regard leads to a hardening of positions and, consequently, the attraction towards anti-semitism itself and all associated conspiracy theories. Surely if jews are, as you theorized, mainly motivated by self-preservation they would realize the perilous position that this complete inadmission of guilt has put them in. Or is it self-deception?

0
1

[–] Tancred 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think you need (ex-)Jews like e.g. Brother Nathanael to spearhead that question.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 1936today ago 

I promise if the US had a trash economy to the extant that Weimar did, their would be just as many, if not more, child prostitutes.

0
12

[–] KroggRache 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thank you for your invaluable work! I have just gotten The Culture of Critique but haven't read it yet, although I've heard excerpts and its reputation certainly proceeds it. Sorry for the length of post but one question that is on my mind stems from seeing and predicting the results of the Jewish lobby. They're trying to engineer the destruction of the European whites; Inciting us to be social justice warriors, to join the LGBT, experiment with our sexuality, discourage us from having kids, instilling "white guilt", make it hard for us to find work, to get a home, more expensive to raise kids, etc. Essentially those whites that will not have kids are the liberal ones, the obedient ones, the 'tolerant' ones. The remaining whites may become the Jewish nightmare; the ones most aware of and most resentful of the Jewish tricks, and they're consciously trying to have as many kids as possible and raise them into the so called alt-right movement. Perhaps the Jews are engineering their own doom by inevitably causing us whites to become their super-enemy. This is my question: In the future when we fight the Jewish power, how do we avoid pushing Jews too hard so that they themselves will not end up becoming our super-enemies?

0
20

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

I do think that there is selection going on whereby Whites with more traditional values are having a disproportionate share of children, or at least a disproportionate percentage of middle class White children. (The White working class is having huge problems. They have suffered the most from globalism and immigration, and the loss of traditional family supports has had a very negative impact on marriage and family life.) It was very heartening to visit with Truecascadia.com people because they are highly socially networked and very family oriented. I had never been to an Alt Right meeting where there were children and wives, etc. We need more of that. The fact that so many educated, urban-dwelling Whites have plugged into the liberal zeitgeist is disastrous. But I am an optimist and I do think things will eventually turn around. But in any case, we have to keep fighting.

0
7

[–] KroggRache 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Yes, I know what you mean. I had the honor and pleasure of getting into an online community that over the course of several months have grown into a couple hundred users. We're like a tightly knit family with shared goals, some of which involves getting together, hopefully some of us end up living within a close proximity, and we can build foundations of real community, and through our diverse skillsets can become less dependent on mainstream means of survival, most of which are poison to our race anyways.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
31

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago 

The longer this dispossession continues, the more cataclysmic the results will be. I do think civil war is a possibility long term. It's interesting that Marine Le Pen said that a result of the election will be a lot of anger, and I think that's true no matter who wins. Le Pen's voters really do think (rightly) that what is happening to France is an absolute disaster. What do they do when they lose hope of winning an election? And the antifa there have already showed their violence when the far left guy didn't make it to the second round. It may get really ugly.

0
12

[–] romainvicta 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

In CoC you argue that Jews have gotten themselves into positions of power that can widely influence the greater population as a form of hyper tribal instinct and survival. At this point, do you think they are looking for total hegemony over the gentiles or is the decadence of non Jewish culture as a result of their influence simply a result of, well, the Jews in power themselves? Since people in charge exert their views and influences over the others.

Also, in your opinion, do you think that Trump is controlled by the tribe? Do Jews have as big of an influence, if not bigger, in politics today than during the Civil Rights era all across the western world as to directly affect the presidencies and top leadership of our countries?

0
17

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The thesis of CofC is that Jewish intellectuals have been the backbone of the intellectual left and have mounted an assault on traditional values, etc. I wouldn't phrase it as a master plan but it is certainly true that Jews on the left wanted to destroy what Abby Hoffman called the WASP power elite and assume a position of power (see: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/04/differences-between-the-eastern-european-immigrant-community-in-the-us-and-the-older-german-jewish-establishment-and-their-commonalities/).Jewish.Jewish) intellectuals also tended to take skeptical, hostile views of traditional Christian morality--see the current article on Occidental Observer -- as John Murray Cuddihy pointed out in The Ordeal of Civility. Jewish power must always make allowance of cooperating non-Jews because Jews are such a small minority, so, for example, neocons have promoted non-Jews who are on page with their ideas, and the same goes for Hollywood, etc. I worry about Trump--especially the apparent demotion of Bannon and the rise of Ivanka/Jared. I am trying to wrap my head around it and write something on it soon, but it's pretty hard without insider knowledge. There certainly are a lot of Jews in the administration and, with perhaps the exception of Steve Miller, they do not have a history of values supporting a rollback on immigration, economic nationalism, non-interventionist foreign policy that we liked Trump for originally. Unlike many on the Alt Right, I have not given up though. Trump is under unbelievable pressure from all sides, including the courts and especially the media, trying to de-legitimize his presidency. In such a situation, it's very difficult to go for radical changes. Perhaps if he can generate more political capital (e,g., if the health care bill is a success--which I doubt), things could change.

0
11

[–] DennisDale1 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

After Jews, what group has the most successful group evolutionary strategy?

0
14

[–] DrKevinMacDonald [S] 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

That's a tough one, partly because there are lots of different types of strategies. Historically, Jews were deeply concerned about keeping their gene pool separate, and other groups have done that. The Middle East is full of them. Recently though in writing about ancient Rome I had the idea that they had a strategy that was open to incorporating new peoples. They were not genetically exclusive but rather gradually absorbed other peoples and allowed them upward mobility--an exogamous group strategy if you wil, sort of like if the EU became a White superstate so that there was gradual mixture among the various European groups. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/04/the-roman-variant-of-indo-european-social-organization-militarization-aristocratic-government-and-openness-to-conquered-peoples-part-2/ This probably made sense when they were dealing with closely related groups (like the different Italian groups) because it allowed them to expand militarily far beyond what would have been possible if they had kept everyone else out. But when they got too far afield, it really became a mishmash and not really an evolutioanary strategy any longer.

load more comments ▼ (61 remaining)