0
8

[–] 8903938 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

A Klan's man as far as I can tell

...

Considering how cucked and impotent christianity has become... His perspective on scriptures might turn out to be more pertinent

2
3

[–] huwiteyffffff 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Ethnic orthodoxy.

Christianity is essential, fundamental, to white, western civilization.

https://www.youtube.com/user/JordanPetersonVideos

1
-1

[–] thealtright 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Christianity is essential, fundamental, to white, western civilization.

Jordan Peterson is great but that is not true at all. How is a foreign cult from the middle east that didn't even show up in Europe until quite recently essential and fundamental? Christianity is not white. White, western civilisation thrived for thousands of years before Christianity. Some of our greatest achievements were in ancient Greece and Rome for example. Christianity plunged Europe into the dark ages for a long time (Just as another Abrahamic cult form the middle east - Islam - is threatening to do) and it was only as that dark cloud slowly began to lift that we began to rise again as a people.

0
1

[–] varialus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The preferred spelling is Klansman, but there's nothing technically wrong with writing Klan's man, especially if your choice to not use the more accepted spelling was intentional. They do have slightly different meanings connotations. A Klan's man means suggests a member of some particular local division of the KKK (it also emphasizes possessiveness, which if your choice of words was intentional is what I'd guess would've been your reasoning for your word choice), whereas Klansman just means a member of the KKK. At least that's the way I interpret the difference between them.

Non-standard grammar generally doesn't upset me like it does some people, but there's usually nothing interesting about using grammar in a non-standard way. This non-standard grammar was intriguing to think about, so thanks for choosing this wording, I enjoyed it.

Edit: Clarified my wording.

1
5

[–] ATX_1138 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Texe Marrs is in my neck of the woods. Even has his show on a local micro FM http://www.texemarrs.com/ http://www.txlr.net/#Schedule

0
3

[–] Secus 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Around blacks never relax.

With jews you lose.

1
-1

[–] thealtright 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Jesus:

Jesus[e] (/ˈdʒiːzəs/ jee-zuss; c. 4 BC – c. AD 30/33), also referred to as Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus Christ,[f] was a Jewish preacher and religious leader who became the central figure of Christianity.[13] Christians believe him to be the Son of God and the awaited Messiah (Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

Christianity

Christianity began as a Jewish sect in the Levant of the middle east in the mid-1st century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity#Early_Church_and_Christological_Councils

Abrahamic religions

Abrahamic religions, emphasizing and tracing their common origin to the tribal patriarch Abraham* The three major Abrahamic religions are:

Judaism

Christianity

Islam

Symbols of the three largest Abrahamic religions: the Jewish Star of David, the Christian cross, and the Islamic star and crescent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

Abraham:

Abraham (Avraham) (Hebrew: אַבְרָהָם)‎‎, originally Abram, is the first of the three patriarchs of Judaism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham

1
4

[–] EarlPoncho 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

(((wikipedia)))? really goy?

Many denominational Christians and even church leaders are under the mistaken belief that Jesus was a Jew. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Judea and Galilee were two separate states and political entities, as illustrated on the map of Palestine in the time of our Saviour in your Bible. Jesus Himself was not a Jew (Judean) or resident of Judea, He was a Galilean or resident of Galilee (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah. The Judeans of prominence were not of the Tribe of Judah, but of Edomites.

stop believing (((their))) lies about christianity

1
1

[–] Nadeshda 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Lol, you started well.. then it all went strange after that...

Well here goes if your interested... sorry its long... "The first thing we note is that this genealogy, in the Gospel of Luke, comes from the non-royal lineage of Prince Nathan, the older brother of King Solomon, both of whom were born to Queen Mother Bathsheba. She was the last and 10th wife of King David that history records was the love of David’s heart. This was a love that he literally was willing to “kill for”. This act to Bathsheba’s first husband, Uriah the Hittite, where he was placed on the front lines of David’s military warriors and died defending his king and his country, placed King David under specific rebuke by the Lord of hosts through the Prophet Nathan. King David, with his transparent and repentant heart, was not only restored to the special favor of God, but through this wife, was born, the last of twenty two sons, Prince Jedidiah, who would become the heir to the throne, and the recipient honoree to build the House of the Lord that in history would be named after him, the famed Temple of Solomon.

This lineage notes the facts of the paternal descendants going back to Prince Neri(ah) ben Melchi, who was the father of Prince Shealtiel by his wife, Princess Tamar, the daughter of Crown Prince Johanan, and the granddaughter of Good King Josiah. Prince Shealtiel in turn was adopted by King Jeconiah, the 2nd husband of now Queen Tamar, who in turn adopted Prince Shealtial and his siblings, a fact commanded in Torah law, that allowed the legal transfer of the inheritance, whether physical inheritance or the royal inheritance to the throne. The conditions were; as long as the dynastic heiress married within her tribe for the physical inheritance (House of Judah) and married within her father’s house (House of David) for the royal title of inheritance to the throne of Kings David and Solomon

By this date, while in exile in the land of Babylon, the lineages of all other known lineages of the royal House of Solomon had become Extinct. Yet it did something very special. It placed a shield of protection to the royal Davidian descendants from the imperial globalists of Babylon, who sought to destroy every royal descendant of the royal House of David, the House of King Solomon, so that there would not be any uprisings or threats to the monarchy of the Babylonian imperial dynasty of King Nebuchadnezzar.

It is amazing about all the weaving within the matrix of history was that God was able to preserve the dynastic lineage of the royal House of King Solomon and do this by the Torah provisions given by the God of Israel to Moses on the mount called Sinai over one thousand five hundred years prior to the birth, life, ministry and death of Jesus the Messiah (Yahshua HaMaschiach). It allowed legally under Torah jurisprudent law to convert the title, that is the “royal title to the throne of David” from a legitimate royal lineage from the House of Solomon that was going extinct, to a non-royal lineage of the same ancestral father, King David, the same ancestral mother, Queen Bathsheba, and from the same ancestral tribe, the Tribe of Judah. Even without a physical father, Jesus the Messiah (Yahshua HaMaschiach), carried the royal title of the royal House of Solomon legally through his mother, Princess Miriam, that young “temple virgin” who was orphaned because her father, Prince Heli, the Davidian and Hasmonean Prince Alexander III “Helios” was executed by King Herod the Great on charges of sedition to the Herodian throne for being a Prince of the House of David and a Hasmonean Prince."

And if that wasn't enough reading for one day... here is useful website for you...

http://www.biblesearchers.com/yahshua/davidian/dynasty9.shtml#ExpandedUzziah

I know lineage can sometimes be painfully boring to some, but truly on the contrary it's one of the most interesting topics, I have ever researched.

Peace and blessings to you and yours...

0
0

[–] SoldierofYAH2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is true. The Messiah was a true Israelite. The people calling themselves "jews" are NOT racial Israelites -- but rather descend from Esau (Edomites), Canaanites, and the Khazars.

Proof: https://israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIsrael/comparet/who-are-jews.html

At the time of the Messiah, a remnant of Israelites and many non-Israelites lived in Jerusalem and the land of Israel. A non-Israelite people known as the Idumeans, or Edomites, were present in the land in great numbers, and actually were the ruling ethnic group, whith a large percentage of the Pharisees and King Herod being Edomites. The "jews" of Jesus' time, and today, are descendants of the Edomites. The Edomites are the descendants of Esau (Jacob/Israel's brother), who took Canaanite wives.

"Edom is in modern Jewry." —The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol.5, p.41

8
-3

[–] marky1991 8 points -3 points (+5|-8) ago 

The church is supposed to follow Christ, not politics. Skimming that page, this isn't a pastor, it's a political speaker that happens to refer to the Bible sometimes.

7
-5