You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 9-11 ago  (edited ago)

It seems you ignored my entire post. Quantum fluxuations are only shown in a laboratory setting, not the vacuum of space, and have the existence of space and time already. This cannot be correlated to a non-describable void where space, time, matter do not exist. period. You seem to have several misconceptions about quantum fluxuations and have a weird desire to plug the gaps in your own creation story with them.

Congratulations, you just decided physics was wrong.

It has application. Only for the understood physical phenomenon it is being used to desribe. To extrapolate that to unobservable points in space and time isn't science. And you are right, I did kind of just disprove most of cosmology and string theory, literally a bum on the street could disprove these entire fields of physics.

0
0

[–] Frenchgeek ago 

You just assumed that because a theory contain a mathematical virtual point one cannot prove the existence of, the whole thing is wrong.

The point isn't a prerequisite for it to work, it is merely a mathematical consequence : The empirical evidence we get from background radiation and universal expansion ( among many, many others ) are the frigging evidence.

And you would have known it, had you read the start of my previous post.

0
0

[–] 9-11 ago 

back ground radiation

it doesn't prove anything pre-big bang... or are you trying to change the subject now? you seem to have more faith than adherence to the scientific method. I've noticed a trend of people like you who completely disregard the scientific method and have turned science into an ideology/religion complete with faith and a creation story - all based on literally nothing.