A little lengthy, but please read for proof.
Up until the 1960s in the United States, laws were still on the books preventing interracial marriage and enforcing racial segregation -- eg, the "Jim Crow" laws prevalent in the southern United States. And the vast majority of the white population in America strongly disapproved of interracial marriage and mixing of the races. Such beliefs were the dominant social norm, and were supported and reinforced through the established churches and other social institutions. Only through the tyranny of the Judaic-controlled Supreme Court of the United States were such laws illegally overturned, and a policy of forced racial integration instituted.
According to the the Jewish establishment -- as we are incessantly reminded by the Jewish-controlled media and Hollywood -- such laws were the epitome of "evil", and the product of "backward-thinking" and a "racist" white establishment who wanted to "oppress the poor negroes". But could it just be that our forefathers had rational and legitimate reasons for these laws and standards? Is it possible that they had valid religious grounds for opposition to race-mixing?
The Bible has been mistranslated and misinterpreted on the issue of race. It actually makes clear that all "humans" are not of common ancestry, and Adam was the father of the white race only. The black, white, and asian races (in their pure-blooded states...absent any mixing among the races) are of completely different lineage, were created separately, and are essentially different species of "humans." The Creator mandated that each species reproduce "after it's kind." And He specifically commanded the Israelites (whom are the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples) to practice racial segregation, and forbid race-mixing:
Deuteronomy 14:2 "For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth."
Exodus 33:16 "So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth."
Deuteronomy 7:3 "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son."
Joshua 23:12-13 "if ye do in any wise go back and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriage with them and go in unto them and they unto you: know for a certainty that they shall be snares and traps unto you and scourges in your sides and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish off from this good land which the Lord your God has given you."
Ezra 9:2 "For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the HOLY SEED have MIXED themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this TRESPASS."
Nehemiah 9:2 "And the seed of Israel separated themselves from all STRANGERS and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers."
Note: "Strangers" above in Nehemiah 9:2 is from Strong's Hebrew word #5236, "nekar", meaning "a foreigner" or an "alien".
Nehemiah 13:3 "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the MIXED multitude."
Hosea 5:7 "They have dealt treacherously against YAHWEH: for they have begotten STRANGE children:"
Note: The word "strange" from Hosea 5:7 is from Strong's Hebrew word #2114, "zuwr", meaning "a foreigner".
Deuteronomy 23:2 "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord, even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."
Note: The word "bastard" above in Deuteronomy 23:2 is from Strong's Hebrew word #4464, "mamzer", which is defined as "a mongrel" or person of mixed-race.
Therefore, the true meaning of this passage is that mongrels or offspring of mixed-race cannot become one of Yahweh's people until after the 10th generation. After the 10th generation, the person would have only 1/1024 (0.1% or 0.001) non-Israelite (non-white) blood in their veins. This shows how seriously Yahweh views racial purity.
-Check original Hebrew words and translation in Strong's Concordance and Hebrew and Greek Lexicon, such as here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/search.cfm
Further reading:
https://israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIsrael/comparet/comp8.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 9-11 ago
Why is it that you think anyone buys into your current theories that admitted cannot begin to explain the period prior to the 'big bang' when space, matter, and time did not exist? Considering they are untestable and nonsubstantiated by empirical evidence, and assuming you are a believer in the scientific method - You shouldn't believe them either.
[–] Frenchgeek ago
The Void is a mathematical construct from the extrapolation of the equations describing the Universe as a black hole ( in matter of its life cycle at least ) : it is the surrounding "element" of the hypothetical point where everything started.
Later experiments in quantum physics have shown a void can experience local fluctuation in energy ( while the net amount of it in the whole system remain zero ), which make the virtual origin point a workable possibility.
The same equations describing hte expansion of the Universe and thermodynamics described a point where the Universe was containg nothing but light ( photons are so simple they came first ) and since there is nothing for that light to disappear to and since it also was freaking everywhere, adding to it the effect of the expansion of the Universe ( currently measured by the doppler effect on nearby and not so nearby galaxies ) we concluded, still using raw unfiltered maths, a global radio background energy of a very specific power and frequency.
AND WE FRIGGING FOUND IT EVERYWHERE WE LOOKED.
So to answer your question : We tested it by testing the consequences of it and not finding alternate explanations that fit better the data.
[–] 9-11 ago
conveniently already with an x,y,z space existing and time ticking away already. The experiments you speak of showing the quantum fluxuations are only possible for brief instants under specific conditions and have demonstrably shown that the larger the mass the briefer the existence, not the other way around. This essentially destroys the entire theory that you seem to be taking on "faith alone".
you cannot use empirically derived formulas to prove anything. I'm not anti-science, i tend to think the evidence of the CBR does in fact show the early expansion of the universe, but you are specifically talking about the "time" before the big bang when time literally didnt exist, not to mention matter, or the xyz plane of space.