Posted by: Kot88
Posting time: 1.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 11/2/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 75
SCP: 35
42 upvotes, 7 downvotes (86% upvoted it)
~4 user(s) here now
This Subverse allows anonymized submissions.
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: Both
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] LargePeter 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
People are IMO about 80% genetic, 20% environment. If someone is born with an IQ of 75 and has the violence gene (about 6% of AA males have it), you’re not making them into a doctor or actuary. This means that as a group, I expect more violence from that group. I am more likely to wait for an individual from that group to prove they are intelligent, non belligerent and capable of being in middle class America.
Does that make me a racist? I’m sure the current culture would say so. I’d call it more common sense than racism.
[–] eongoat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'd say also that in most group situations the Violence gene individual will be somewhat of an alpha of a group, if not the alpha. I see group attack after group attack with Africans, but statistically they can't all have the violence gene. I wonder what would happen if we removed them from society.