You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
To a degree I would agree. In fact I would posit that anger is necessary (in limited amounts or pending the appropriate situation).
When I say he's "given to anger," I'm talking dropping the "banhammer" on someone who makes a naïve or innocuous comment. He'll over-analyze it and suddenly snap. Not very fond of that.
Yeah, that kind of behavior is common in "creators" that didn't really use the internet prior to 2010. These people are used to the walled gardens on YouTube or twitch etc that gave them ban rights without consequences for banning people constantly.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] SilentByAssociation ago
To a degree I would agree. In fact I would posit that anger is necessary (in limited amounts or pending the appropriate situation).
When I say he's "given to anger," I'm talking dropping the "banhammer" on someone who makes a naïve or innocuous comment. He'll over-analyze it and suddenly snap. Not very fond of that.
[–] badruns ago
Yeah, that kind of behavior is common in "creators" that didn't really use the internet prior to 2010. These people are used to the walled gardens on YouTube or twitch etc that gave them ban rights without consequences for banning people constantly.