You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] markrod420 ago 

Its a fact. It may never happen. But its an objective fact that our society would be better off if they didnt.

2
-2

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

But its an objective

It makes no sense to focus on the consequence and ignore the cause. The female vote is a consequence of allowing weak men to vote. The weak men vote is as bad as the female vote AND it caused the female vote, so it has to be solved first.

Find a way to ban weak men from voting, and the female vote will vanish by itself. Trying to remove women directly is futile as long as millions of pink-hat-wearing pussy-starved gammas are salivating to stab you in the back.

0
0

[–] we_kill_creativity ago 

Find a way to ban weak men from voting,

It's called only male, net tax contributors can vote. And I don't accept that "weak men" voting is what allowed women to vote.

I don't think men ever did vote for women to vote because men in their natural state never would vote for that. On top of that, there were large numbers of women against women getting the vote at the time.

I highly suspect that if we were to ever get an honest investigation into women's suffrage we'd learn it was one of the biggest false flags in history.

0
0

[–] DrShitlord ago 

Excellent analysis. Weak men created this situation.

Still, from a making-harpies-screech perspective, stickers with "repeal the 19th" are way more fun than "it's okay to be white" or "all lives matter".

0
0

[–] markrod420 ago 

You are correct