Just because the bottom of something is hidden, does not automatically make the curve the reason behind it.
This an irrefutable fact of how you view the world around you and easily tested by laying on the ground and having someone walk away from you over a distance. The object in question disappears bottom up because the view of your angle is limiting its range creating a "false horizon". This is shown clearly by watching ships disappear over the "horizon" only to be brought back into view with modern magnification equipment. The curve did not hide the bottom of the object, the ground did. And the ground did it at less than the distance needed for curvature to take great enough effect to achieve the same result.
One can raise their viewing angle and see further but the ground will cover their view. Their angle of perspective determines the distance to the false horizon whereby the object "shrinks" to converge at this center line. The bottom disappears first due to the ground.
Resolution is the shortest distance between two points that a user can still see as separate images. This is why the object shrinks to the center line and the ground is the reason why the bottom of the object "disappears" first. This is shown at distances well below the required amount allotted for curvature effect and done on any scale.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ifuckdolphinseverday [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
One of the only verses that receives even a blip in response to thoughts like these. Regardless of the obvious insinuations its a very fundamental concept that should be understood yet is not and instead replaced with another solution rather than the correct solution, a pattern that has not gone unnoticed when one views academia for goys truthfully.
[–] TheRealFooBar 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Look, the entire flat earth story has been debunked countless times. But just for the sake of entertainment, please show me the underside of the earth, or the edge.
[–] ifuckdolphinseverday [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Flat earth?
So you're a dumb nigger too?
What I've described (and the entire point for you morons) is to show that objects that disappear from the bottom up do so not from the curvature of the earth but rather from fundamental properties of vision and sight. It doesn't matter what model you espouse, what i have described is an irrefutable fact. Or are you so fucking ignorant and limited in your thinking that you fail to grasp this basic concept which applies to either an infinite plane or sphere. You'd observe the same phenomenon on both.
You should really slow down your reading. Just because something disappears bottom up, does not make it exclusively the result of the curvature. It actually occurs do to the nature of vision and sight and occurs at less than the distance required for the curvature to achieve the same result.
Show me where i said the earth was flat. I never did.