You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-2

[–] ifuckdolphinseverday [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

One of the only verses that receives even a blip in response to thoughts like these. Regardless of the obvious insinuations its a very fundamental concept that should be understood yet is not and instead replaced with another solution rather than the correct solution, a pattern that has not gone unnoticed when one views academia for goys truthfully.

1
1

[–] TheRealFooBar 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

I only speak to retards who agree with me. Why are people with an IQ above room temperature suddenly disagreeing with me?

Look, the entire flat earth story has been debunked countless times. But just for the sake of entertainment, please show me the underside of the earth, or the edge.

2
-2

[–] ifuckdolphinseverday [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Flat earth?

So you're a dumb nigger too?

What I've described (and the entire point for you morons) is to show that objects that disappear from the bottom up do so not from the curvature of the earth but rather from fundamental properties of vision and sight. It doesn't matter what model you espouse, what i have described is an irrefutable fact. Or are you so fucking ignorant and limited in your thinking that you fail to grasp this basic concept which applies to either an infinite plane or sphere. You'd observe the same phenomenon on both.

You should really slow down your reading. Just because something disappears bottom up, does not make it exclusively the result of the curvature. It actually occurs do to the nature of vision and sight and occurs at less than the distance required for the curvature to achieve the same result.

Show me where i said the earth was flat. I never did.