You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Amendment 11 Article 3 of the Constitution (Possible 11.3 marker) states that the SC cannot rule on one state charging another state with voter fraud but individuals can on behalf of the people which is what the Lin Wood/ Sidney Powell cases are. The SC will rule according to the Constitution on those. They are just going thru all the motions so the DS cannot claim that they didn't, plus to show the public the process.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] InABlinkOfAnEye 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Amendment 11 Article 3 of the Constitution (Possible 11.3 marker) states that the SC cannot rule on one state charging another state with voter fraud but individuals can on behalf of the people which is what the Lin Wood/ Sidney Powell cases are. The SC will rule according to the Constitution on those. They are just going thru all the motions so the DS cannot claim that they didn't, plus to show the public the process.
[–] KakistocracyClerk 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Hope you are right that this is all optics and they eventually do the right thing.