You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]Lawyer423 points
-3 points
0 points
(+0|-3)
ago
Yes. Gore v. Bush was a state law case (it was an appeal from the Florida State Supreme Court) that went up to the SC. It was not a case about one state suing another, i.e. Texas did not sue Florida. Standing was not the issue in Bush v. Gore. The issue was equal protection because there was no procedure in place to figure out hanging chads and because the court determined that there was insufficient time to grant relief even if a procedure could be figured out.
Ironically, the holding in Bush v. Gore actually helps Biden because the holding that there wasn't enough time to make changes creates precedent that the Court will the dates in federal law and are not going to alter them. Also, the Court made the decision to not invalidate Florida's election, but instead said that the count would stay as-is since it couldn't be fixed in time. That help's Biden's argument, not Trump.
Sort: Top
[–] cabalstone 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Easy summary from the contents of the Reply...
[–] Lawyer42 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
The SCOTUS is going to deny this petition due to lack of Standing. Sometimes the law does not have a solution to every problem.
[–] Justice_Will_Prevail [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Even with respect to the Bush v. Gore decision?
[–] Lawyer42 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
Yes. Gore v. Bush was a state law case (it was an appeal from the Florida State Supreme Court) that went up to the SC. It was not a case about one state suing another, i.e. Texas did not sue Florida. Standing was not the issue in Bush v. Gore. The issue was equal protection because there was no procedure in place to figure out hanging chads and because the court determined that there was insufficient time to grant relief even if a procedure could be figured out.
Ironically, the holding in Bush v. Gore actually helps Biden because the holding that there wasn't enough time to make changes creates precedent that the Court will the dates in federal law and are not going to alter them. Also, the Court made the decision to not invalidate Florida's election, but instead said that the count would stay as-is since it couldn't be fixed in time. That help's Biden's argument, not Trump.