The District of Columbia filed a legal brief on behalf of 22 blue states on Dec. 10 opposing a lawsuit request filed with the Supreme Court by the State of Texas, which challenges the election results in four battleground states.
The group represents all of the states with Democratic attorneys general not counting the four defendants: Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
“The people have chosen. But Texas, supported by 17 other states, asks this Court to overturn that choice,” the brief (pdf), signed by District of Columbia Solicitor General Loren Alikhan, states. “Amici States urge this Court to reject Texas’s last-minute attempt to throw out the results of an election decided by the people and securely overseen and certified by its sister states.”
Full Sauce: https://www.ntd.com/22-states-file-brief-in-opposition-to-texas-supreme-court-election-lawsuit_538561.html
Sort: Top
[–] Scrapedneepuks 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
The only thing that matters is what the Constitutions says, not what they nor us say about election fraud. What also matters is the reliability of the Court. So far Justice has been corrupt at almost every opportunity in all parts of our gov't. That track record leaves little in the way of a positive judicial outcome. Justice either way will be pristinely exposed in this case.
[–] mtewamp ago
My Nigger...
[–] needlesdog 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Words matter! Texas is not claiming voter fraud, they are saying and have proven these swing states did not follow their own laws or the constitution. Did I put a period on that!! PYHOOYA= Pull your head out of your A$$
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[–] Christosgnosis ago
gonna probably have to prove the election fraud in these states to the SCOTUS too in order to dispel any temptation for them to try to form a ruling that, well, we're not going to overturn an election outcome if there was no appreciable election fraud that actually happened (even if they agree that clearly the defendant states did not adhere to the US constitution)
because a lot of times judicial rulings end up revolving around damages done to the aggrieved party in the law suit
So probably going to be incumbent on Texas (and Pres. Trump) to prove they were indeed injured by election fraud in these named states where said fraud was facilitated by these states abandoning the strictures of the US constitution
[–] bisQuit 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
"securely overseen..."
The fucking audacity of these mf'ers
[–] AndyMan_45 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It was "securely overseen." By the fucking chinese.
[–] Pollycracker ago
Yes, by China.
[–] Fateswebb 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
pres better drop that fucking skytl server deets asap. wtf this has gone far enough. now it is time.
[–] JS5547 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Blue states and DC says it all
[–] mhyde1 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Blue cities. The rest of their states are pretty red.
[–] Aslanisonthemove 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The war is on !
[–] AngelofDeath 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Civil War 2.0
Just what the Jews want.
REMEMBER the niggers and Jews did this as you kill those liberals.