You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
The first name he mentions as a supporter is Robert David Steele, who is also counter-intel for the DS. Steele has wormed his way into the Q movement deeply enough to draw a fairly significant audience. That gives this guy a boost in terms of believability. At least among those who trust Steele.
This guy's (what's his name?) family background in the CIA through MI-6 is probably easy to track, so he tells us that in order to give himself some sort of credibility, then turns around and gives us some stories about refusing to work for the CIA in order to gain our trust. He then goes on to remind us of his connection to Steele and makes a few comments to make us think he's already a known persona among the Q movement (not sure if he is), further building up his reputation to his viewers.
When he gets into the disinformation he wants to spread, he tells us that Gina Haspel just suddenly decided to "sing like a canary" at the last minute while on her way to Gitmo. The rest of what he says about the story he's pushing is just excessive detail to make him sound like he's on the inside of what's going on, but it's really just more BS. He draws in the FBI and tries to convince us that we can trust them. He goes on to defend himself against alleged doubters and uses the lamest of excuses (on a par with Prince Andrew) to make us think he should be trusted. "I got a job in America, and that must tell you something". He then tries to convince us further that he's legitimate and on the inside by telling us that Trump knew the people who he says were shot in Frankfurt and was incredibly moved on hearing about their deaths. He says that Trump had to be kept from crying (suggesting that he's weak) because he was in front of a bunch of soldiers, which doesn't make sense that he would be informed of the deaths in such a setting.
The last of what he says is another attempt to legitimize himself by suggesting that we check him out on the internet, and tells us that he has groups all over the place, but doesn't do much to inform us where to look. Why the need for separate groups, if he's on the internet? He makes a point that he doesn't charge for anything and his organization survives through donations, and ends by telling us that he plans to build a healing center, which sounds to me like a tug at the emotions to get you to believe him and to send him money.
He closes with another final suggestion of how honest he is and that he's on the good side fighting the bad side. Just a reminder that we should believe him.
It's always the same basic formula with these counter-intel people. Nothing to verify their claims (because it doesn't exist), and a lot of long-winded talk about how credible they are (because they aren't), mixed with emotional softeners at beginning and end.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] moderator99 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This guy is counter-intel for the DS.
The first name he mentions as a supporter is Robert David Steele, who is also counter-intel for the DS. Steele has wormed his way into the Q movement deeply enough to draw a fairly significant audience. That gives this guy a boost in terms of believability. At least among those who trust Steele.
This guy's (what's his name?) family background in the CIA through MI-6 is probably easy to track, so he tells us that in order to give himself some sort of credibility, then turns around and gives us some stories about refusing to work for the CIA in order to gain our trust. He then goes on to remind us of his connection to Steele and makes a few comments to make us think he's already a known persona among the Q movement (not sure if he is), further building up his reputation to his viewers.
When he gets into the disinformation he wants to spread, he tells us that Gina Haspel just suddenly decided to "sing like a canary" at the last minute while on her way to Gitmo. The rest of what he says about the story he's pushing is just excessive detail to make him sound like he's on the inside of what's going on, but it's really just more BS. He draws in the FBI and tries to convince us that we can trust them. He goes on to defend himself against alleged doubters and uses the lamest of excuses (on a par with Prince Andrew) to make us think he should be trusted. "I got a job in America, and that must tell you something". He then tries to convince us further that he's legitimate and on the inside by telling us that Trump knew the people who he says were shot in Frankfurt and was incredibly moved on hearing about their deaths. He says that Trump had to be kept from crying (suggesting that he's weak) because he was in front of a bunch of soldiers, which doesn't make sense that he would be informed of the deaths in such a setting.
The last of what he says is another attempt to legitimize himself by suggesting that we check him out on the internet, and tells us that he has groups all over the place, but doesn't do much to inform us where to look. Why the need for separate groups, if he's on the internet? He makes a point that he doesn't charge for anything and his organization survives through donations, and ends by telling us that he plans to build a healing center, which sounds to me like a tug at the emotions to get you to believe him and to send him money.
He closes with another final suggestion of how honest he is and that he's on the good side fighting the bad side. Just a reminder that we should believe him.
It's always the same basic formula with these counter-intel people. Nothing to verify their claims (because it doesn't exist), and a lot of long-winded talk about how credible they are (because they aren't), mixed with emotional softeners at beginning and end.