You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] cabalstone 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I don't know if my response was clear.

It doesn't matter whether or not a vaccine can alter DNA. Promoting the belief, true or not, serves to deflect opposition toward the nature of the vaccine. So a vaccine that doesn't alter DNA is acceptable? No...of course not, so opposition is misdirected to vaccines in general.

Opposition is properly directed at those who would categorize anyone as 'non-human' for any reason. It isn't that one must oppose vaccination. One must oppose the notion that government has any right to mandate vaccination.

[–] moderator99 ago 

She's not trying to deflect opposition to vaccines by making people think that a vaccine that doesn't affect DNA is okay. She's outlining some facts that she and the body of people she's been working with have learned about the vaccines being produced by Moderna and others.

I don't really want to get into any deep discussions right now (not in the best health right now), but I think the woman was pointing people to look at the long-range plans that the cabal has been pursuing for along time through technology. She's filling in part of the bigger picture. That's why I think it's important that people hear what she's saying.

If she knows all this then Trump does too, so I feel that it's a preliminary heads up for the Big Pharma take-down. You don't really think Trump is okay with any sort of vaccine, do you? He's setting them up, and this is what will knock them down.

[–] cabalstone ago 

not in the best health right now

Feel better, 99. I'm not in much of a mood for deep discussion either. The slow denouement of the election end-game is making me crazy.