You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] Lurker17 [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Q using false positive to protect Grassley from the coming storm? Hard to say what is real in the fog of war.

[–] corrbrick ago 

Sorry, Lurker. I wasn't criticizing your post. I was criticizing the robot-like reaction to the phrase, "tested positive." As if it really means something. It could, but according to even the NY Slimes, in 96% of the cases, it doesn't.

[–] Lurker17 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I didn't take it as criticism, and even if it was I would either defend why I disagree or say I agree with you and why. Feel free to critique everything I post yea or nay, I can handle criticism. We are all here to learn.

I'm not sure if Grassley's positive is real (with multiple verifications) or a plausible excuse using cv-19 positive results to get him out of DC and keep him safe over the next couple of weeks while TSHTF.