You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]Jonny_Ninja[S]0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
You'd have to ask him to be sure.
But I think he's implying that end is covered via CISA.
That doesn't mean they weren't allowed to do it, either. I think he is asserting that if they were in fact allowed to do it, it's because CISA allowed for them to just to catch them in the act.
He believes that all or most of the steal came in the form of physical ballots. Maybe he's wrong.
[–]Fateswebb0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
well sure, I mean... hopefully, the problem is the only legal person I have seen discussing the computer glitches is sydney powell, rudy doesn't even bring it up.. I would feel a lot more confident if rudy mentioned it..
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Fateswebb ago
what does he mean, "there is no reason to talk about hacking into voting machines, because that is covered?"
whats covered?
[–] Jonny_Ninja [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You'd have to ask him to be sure.
But I think he's implying that end is covered via CISA.
That doesn't mean they weren't allowed to do it, either. I think he is asserting that if they were in fact allowed to do it, it's because CISA allowed for them to just to catch them in the act.
He believes that all or most of the steal came in the form of physical ballots. Maybe he's wrong.
[–] Fateswebb ago
well sure, I mean... hopefully, the problem is the only legal person I have seen discussing the computer glitches is sydney powell, rudy doesn't even bring it up.. I would feel a lot more confident if rudy mentioned it..