Dr. Steve Pieczenik reveals the entire Presidency has been an enormous STING OPERATION including Q Proofs while deilvering the Staggering Details. The crime has to be allowed to occur, which it is and then the roll up begins. They Have It ALL and ITS GLORIOUS !!!!
https://banned.video/watch?id=5fa480cc65f2d419a08b54e2
edit: I just noticed rikki6 got this out over an hour ago and it was not visible so I'll add my comments:
Glad you got this one through the log jam, riveting intel. When he says 'Eric' he is refering to Eric Prince. The Mop Up is coming, we are watching the Trump Haters Froth in celebration only to be Rolled up. Screaming at the sky upon the Hillary Loss will be pale in comparison. Remember that " Love Trumps Hate " slogan THEY coined, It sure works like a charm now eh ? Everybody that Voted for Trump, the 70 MILLION Absolutely Love him and all the paultry 25 million that voted against him did so with hate for him, not because they truly felt Biden/Harris was going to help America. The other 20 Million are brainwashed and the balance is Fraud. Now I want to watch all these glow fag MSM tards eat prison viddles.
edit: Forgot to add, not only did the ballots have water marked block chain encrypted code, it also had a trackable signiture where the ballot itself could be physically traced, including location and GPS movement. Sooo. . . yeah.
The discussion went MUCH further, Dr. P also stressed that the entire COVID is TOTAL BS, everybody knows it and it was part of the ENTIRE Nefarious plan that included the election steal as the swan song. you all guessed it correctly in its entirety. They even went on to say that the mask was intented as a weapon and identifying protocol to mark the weak minded. Q team was 100%
view the rest of the comments →
[–] grace8 ago
The NY post link is from 11/3. That makes it info before/during time when Steve claims the watermark was secretly placed on legal ballots. So no CISA would not announce/admit it at that time and ruin the sting.
Can’t get access: I did see yesterday a report that 14 million ballots had been checked and that 48% of ballots checked in 2 of the contested states did not have the watermark. I think it should be in 8kun notables. As far as how do u tell if ballots have been dumped, Steve claims the isotopes tell them where a ballot is.
As far as if someone saved a bunch of ballots and filled in: they would not have the watermark if they were received after watermark was put on legal ballots received before deadline.
As far as ballot manipulation: if a ballot is scanned at the voting place scanners create a ballot image. Voters have a right to see their ballot image. If votes are flipped by programming in scanner comparing the ballot image count to the scanner count would show a discrepancy. Recently, in MA ballot images were destroyed before they could be audited. Election board tried to claim they were not legal voting records. Court precedent says they are.
Also software/firmware on a scanner can be audited by creating 20 ballots for Trump, scanning them in and then checking the tabulation to see if it is correct. Or when an irregularity is found in the count, the election board can recount by hand and compare. This happened yesterday in Atrium county and the count was very different. Was that Utah?
Destroyed votes: if the ballot has the isotopes and it sends a signal where it is the destroyed ballot can be found. If it is microscopic, shredding would not destroy it. If they were taken somewhere to be dumped/burned those tracking would have seen they were removed from counting center and intervened.
If Steve can be trusted then a lot of fraud can be proved if they get access.
The vote manipulation is so obvious because Biden got too few legal votes to make it a close election. If that can force a hand recount, that requires a observer from both parties to be present and see the ballot up close. They have to agree what each ballot says before the vote is recorded. That is if they can be forced to allow GOP observers to verify each ballot then the count will show discrepancy.