You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] moderator99 ago 

It's not a pattern. A few times there have been dog-related tweets that people have suggested had some sort of significance, but were never able to tell us what that was. It comes from the fact that Q mentioned dogs when referring to McCain and Bush deaths. So unless you can explain how this Google 'dog comm' has any significance or shows a pattern, you have nothing.

Please explain the pattern.

[–] Kzintrooper2016 [S] ago 

Just that. Prominent people have posted pictures about a dog's passing, and shortly after there have been major deaths in the news.

Sometimes there have been postings, but no public deaths.

Maybe it is all nothing, but observations and hints and clues can lead to larger things.

[–] moderator99 ago 

Google's front page isn't the same thing as a prominent person.

That prominent people die is something that happens regularly. Trying to tie every dog comment to a death is ridiculous.

You are helping others with the same inclination to make false associations continue to do so. And I will continue to point out the absurdity of it whenever I see it.