You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[+]goofy3000 points4 points4 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]goofy3000 points
4 points
4 points
(+4|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Didn't say anywhere he would vote yes on the nomination. So this isn't a vote for the nomination. He can still vote no. Wake up to this jerk people. He isn't a republican vote for the nominee.
Same can be said for Collins and Murkowski. They didn't say they wouldn't vote. They said they didn't think the Senate should hold a vote. But Mitch will so will they vote yea or na? I say they do vote yes. But I think Mitt will fuck us. He's too deep in Ukraine to stop IMO.
I agree. I wish I knew where I read about voting ‘present’. If some senators vote present then they do not need the majority (51) to confirm. ?? I think Murkowski voted present on Kavanaugh. I’ll have to go look for the article I read . .
view the rest of the comments →
[–] goofy300 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Didn't say anywhere he would vote yes on the nomination. So this isn't a vote for the nomination. He can still vote no. Wake up to this jerk people. He isn't a republican vote for the nominee.
[–] rickki6 [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
i dont trust him either
[–] nevergiveup2them 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Same can be said for Collins and Murkowski. They didn't say they wouldn't vote. They said they didn't think the Senate should hold a vote. But Mitch will so will they vote yea or na? I say they do vote yes. But I think Mitt will fuck us. He's too deep in Ukraine to stop IMO.
[–] tossitrightinthere ago
I agree. I wish I knew where I read about voting ‘present’. If some senators vote present then they do not need the majority (51) to confirm. ?? I think Murkowski voted present on Kavanaugh. I’ll have to go look for the article I read . .