You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] Q20191776 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Also found Tashina Gauhar in the Moffa transcript during Congressional testimony related to MYE on p167-168, I believe:

"BY MS. KIM:

Q. One unfortunate byproduct of conspiracy theories is that innocent individuals keep getting dragged into conspiracy theories.
A. Uh-huh.
Q. There is a conspiracy theory that an attorney at the Justice Department named Tashina Gauhar was involved with you and Mr. Strzok in doing the secondary review of the new emails. Is that correct?
A. I've never heard that before. Is the question was she involved?
Q. Was she involved?

A. Can I confer for 2 seconds?
Q. Yes.
A. Thank you. [Discussion off the record.]

Mr. Moffa. Sorry. I was just checking on her SES status. She was not involved.

BY MS. KIM:

Q. She was not involved --
A. She was not involved.
Q. -- in the secondary review.
A. No. Of the Weiner laptop? No.
Q. In your opinion, was the review of the emails found on the Weiner laptop thorough?
A. I believe it was.
Q. Was it even-handed and neutral?
A. I believe it was.
Q. Did any information discovered in reviewing the emails on the laptop change the legal conclusion as to whether Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted?
A. Although classified information was found, it was classified information we had previously identified had been mishandled using the email system. And so, for that reason, it didn't change -- and, again, this was not a decision I made -- it did not change the sort of prosecutive implications when the OGC lawyers took a look at it. "