You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]Jonny_Ninja0 points
3 points
3 points
(+3|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Guys, don't just read the headline. Read the article.
A private practice attorney wants documents and the Feds aren't ready to give them to him. Could it have to do with the election? Possibly.
But also consider that the Feds can't comment on ongoing investigations, nor can they comment on investigations that they're using to indict before an indictment.
Let's say they've already made charges and the grand jury simply hasn't convened yet. They can't disclose info on the case because it would undermine the entire operation. You want people to walk on a technicality? Because that's one way to make that happen.
Or let's say there are no charges filed yet but they plan to file them. Same thing applies. They can't give info on it or else again, they jeapordize the case.
Point being, there are other plausible reasons why they can't give out that info yet aside from "they're trying to screw us."
The way it's supposed to work by the book is that information like that isn't made public until after charges are filed and indictments handed down. Anything short of precisely that jeapordizes the case and basically gives the perps a get out of jail free card. You don't have to like it, but facts don't just magically cease to exist because you don't like them.
Sort: Top
[–] CryptoBard 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago (edited ago)
Send in the National Guard, I'm sick of this shit. Justice does not run by the election-cycle clock.
[–] hildberht 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Trust Wray.
Q has to explain that statement, Wray is pathetic.
[–] TheRealIndianaJoe 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Justice delayed is justice denied.
[–] Hoppinmad 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Give us a hint Q.
Is this movie more like death wish or the never ending story?
[–] AndyMan_45 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
It's definitely turning into the Planet of the Apes.
[–] brettco12 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I feel like I'm too old to see the end of the movie. I wouldn't have started it if q said it's a 8 years long movie- minimum.
[–] PacaGoat 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
On the one hand it hacks me off to no end. On the other hand, me thinks this is a ploy.
Maxwells arrest is good, but we have about a thousand high value targets we need to arrest. Yesterday!
[–] COAnon 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Total BS. Provide it now. Our government is nothing but delay, delay, delay.
People involved had better go to prison.
[–] Podingo7 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
That's because both agencies were informed of Clinton's soon to be announced presidential/VP bid...
[–] rickki6 [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Ur not the first person to say this re: Clinton
[–] KyJane 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That was my very first thought also! What other possible reason would they have for withholding it? I can't see any other reason at all.
[–] Jonny_Ninja 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Guys, don't just read the headline. Read the article.
A private practice attorney wants documents and the Feds aren't ready to give them to him. Could it have to do with the election? Possibly.
But also consider that the Feds can't comment on ongoing investigations, nor can they comment on investigations that they're using to indict before an indictment.
Let's say they've already made charges and the grand jury simply hasn't convened yet. They can't disclose info on the case because it would undermine the entire operation. You want people to walk on a technicality? Because that's one way to make that happen.
Or let's say there are no charges filed yet but they plan to file them. Same thing applies. They can't give info on it or else again, they jeapordize the case.
Point being, there are other plausible reasons why they can't give out that info yet aside from "they're trying to screw us."
The way it's supposed to work by the book is that information like that isn't made public until after charges are filed and indictments handed down. Anything short of precisely that jeapordizes the case and basically gives the perps a get out of jail free card. You don't have to like it, but facts don't just magically cease to exist because you don't like them.
Take a step back, cool down, and think.
[–] moderator99 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
^^^THIS
(again, but better)