You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Thomath ago 

The article is logically flawed.

Initial charges are QAnon is a "threat to the global church"

Global church? Churches are local, a community of people called together for a purpose. There is one Lord of all. All other structures (global church?) are structures designed and created by man. I looked through the article for examples on how QAnon is threatening the church - to build the case with examples of infiltration, attacks, corruptions, threats, etc.

Nothing.

The author then states that the QAnon movement is connected to the "1980's-era Satanic ritual abuse panic". But the only similarity given is the core belief that there are some very evil and powerful entities that work together for evil purposes. (Don't Christians teach this belief also?) Where are the "connection" examples of QAnon and SRA?

Nothing.

The conclusion then is that QAnon is "a satanic movement infiltrating our churches."

(Whose church?)

As a concluding point of emphasis, the author drives the point home by stating that members of QAnon frequently engage in slander and lies. There are readily available examples of slander and lies expressed by members of pretty much any large organization of people - churches, political parties, movements, etc. I prefer to observe how such organizations self-police their own. Therein I see large differences in their integrity.

His conclusion: the church has to attack QAnon now. Attack? Attack people?

I believe the logic to reach this conclusion does not exist anywhere in the article.

The choice weapon of offense (attack): The Sword of Truth.