I finally found the stomach to listen to what Brennan in a frontline interview had to say .... armed with knowing what we know now., I wanted to hear the other side ...
It is clear from the onset that the fear of Russian interference in the election, I think, has to be understood as Russian monitoring of the election manipulation by the dems! You read that right.
The whole interview is a nicely crafted piece of work, where only softballs are being thrown. Yet, there are some gems in there.
Especially, after 1:20:00.
https://invidio.us/watch?v=1iWbvJhbPaA
- Brennan clearly indicates he too thought he never thought she would lose.
- They hatched a plan for the event they had to push for remedial action AFTER the elections in the event of an unlikely Trump win, because Brennan did not know whether the Russians would do nothing at all. (Meaning: there was shit to go on. They had nothing. It explains why his warning to the FSB did not return a positive / negative response from Putin)
- The press was very worried about what Putin told Trump (remember the footbal?). And if the press is worried: Brennan was worried.
- Russians were bombing the shit out of the DS armed rebels in Syria. Obama did not like it none. Brennan did not like it. It was understood Putin would get a certain latitude to do his thing, and US would do nothing vis a vis Crimea/ Eastern Ukraine. Trump was right.
- Russians keep a lower profile, and Trump destroys ISIS.
- Transition: Brennan was offended when after the elections no one came knocking on his door for a brieving. hahahaha, the fucker was spying on Team Trump ....
- He was offended for not having the CIA director role. What a nice example of muslime. Trump's speech was nice and endearing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMBqDN7-QLg
view the rest of the comments →
[–] mismacheta 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Or who killed them is a better question I think.