Archived The 14th Amendment says you have the RIGHT TO BE SECURE IN YOUR PERSON! (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by ArielQflip
Posted by: ArielQflip
Posting time: 7 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 8/18/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 357
SCP: 75
76 upvotes, 1 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
Archived The 14th Amendment says you have the RIGHT TO BE SECURE IN YOUR PERSON! (GreatAwakening)
submitted ago by ArielQflip
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ArielQflip [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Cornell Law says this:
The Due Process Clause provides that no states shall deprive any “person” of “life, liberty or property” without due process of law. A historical controversy has been waged concerning whether the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment intended the word “person” to mean only natural persons, or whether the word was substituted for the word “citizen” with a view to protecting corporations from oppressive state legislation.41 As early as the 1877 Granger Cases42 the Supreme Court upheld various regulatory state laws without raising any question as to whether a corporation could advance due process claims. Further, there is no doubt that a corporation may not be deprived of its property without due process of law.
43 Although various decisions have held that the “liberty” guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment is the liberty of natural,44 not artificial, persons,45 nevertheless, in 1936, a newspaper corporation successfully objected that a state law deprived it of liberty of the press.46
A separate question is the ability of a government official to invoke the Due Process Clause to protect the interests of his office. Ordinarily, the mere official interest of a public officer, such as the interest in enforcing a law, has not been deemed adequate to enable him to challenge the constitutionality of a law under the Fourteenth Amendment.47 Similarly, municipal corporations have no standing “to invoke the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment in opposition to the will of their creator,” the state.48 However, state officers are acknowledged to have an interest, despite their not having sustained any “private damage,” in resisting an “endeavor to prevent the enforcement of statutes in relation to which they have official duties,” and, accordingly, may apply to federal courts “to review decisions of state courts declaring state statutes, which [they] seek to enforce, to be repugnant to the [Fourteenth Amendment of] the Federal Constitution . . . .”49
Either STAND YOUR GROUND OF LIBERTY AND LIFE, or be a SHEEP/NPC who gives his LIBERTIES UP!
FUCK THE QUAGMIRE OF ignorant REGULATIONS! FIGHT!
I would gladly give up my FREEDOM the Constitution affords to show that:
If you don't know the repercussions of not following a "guideline", from your employer, your Corporation, your LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL governments, your clients of livelihood then you don't know your RIGHTS.
This is not NEGOTIABLE!