You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]TRFBYTrC0mmies0 points
11 points
11 points
(+11|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I’m not ready to declare the tide has turned as a result of one article, but, it’s pretty damn shocking that yahoo would be anywhere near that article.
Laying the groundwork for Biden's removal? - enter Hillary? Obama is willing to possibly take the hit here to keep the attention focused on him and his cronies and not her. Clog up the news cycle - hey look over here and not over there. Haven't heard much about Hillary's misdeeds as of late. Hmmm... Maybe some twittershere reminders would be in order - just to refresh everyone's memories.
"None of this means that Obama committed some specific crime; he almost assuredly did not. In a healthy media environment, though, the mounting evidence of wrongdoing would spark an outpouring of journalistic curiosity."
[–]gatoreric[S]0 points
3 points
3 points
(+3|-0)
ago
right now with the evidence the National Review, Yahoo, etc has they don't see a specific crime yet like we do. We have intel they don't know about concerning BO. Look at the flip flop though--usually they give 5 paragraphs of anti Trump BS and then just 1 line of "but Trump has not committed a crime".
for the frst time in over half a century at least we have the hard left (anti vaxxers) marching WITH the hard right (constitutionalists) against the establishment
[–]gatoreric[S]0 points
10 points
10 points
(+10|-0)
ago
exactly, a liberal site linking to a conservative one. And not just any article, but one thoroughly slamming Obamagate and other corruption. In the past they would have written a hit piece challenging it, or called it fake news.
Sort: Top
[–] TRFBYTrC0mmies 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago (edited ago)
I’m not ready to declare the tide has turned as a result of one article, but, it’s pretty damn shocking that yahoo would be anywhere near that article.
[–] 45andQ 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I wonder if some journalists have been indicted and now they see their fates in front of them. That would be awesome!
[–] mac1221 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Laying the groundwork for Biden's removal? - enter Hillary? Obama is willing to possibly take the hit here to keep the attention focused on him and his cronies and not her. Clog up the news cycle - hey look over here and not over there. Haven't heard much about Hillary's misdeeds as of late. Hmmm... Maybe some twittershere reminders would be in order - just to refresh everyone's memories.
[–] Six_Cents 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
Hell hath frozen over.
[–] RoBatten 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Even better than the article are the comments! Everyone agrees! People seem to be waking up.
[–] SumfinElse 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
They had me until this...
"None of this means that Obama committed some specific crime; he almost assuredly did not. In a healthy media environment, though, the mounting evidence of wrongdoing would spark an outpouring of journalistic curiosity."
Most assuredly's hairy asshole!
[–] 45andQ 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
They had to stick that in there or their tiny viewership would revolt. LOL!
[–] gatoreric [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
right now with the evidence the National Review, Yahoo, etc has they don't see a specific crime yet like we do. We have intel they don't know about concerning BO. Look at the flip flop though--usually they give 5 paragraphs of anti Trump BS and then just 1 line of "but Trump has not committed a crime".
[–] QDPie 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well they had to toss that in to save their hide. Them there is what we call "Weasel Words."
[–] Balthsgirl 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well it IS on yahoo. They had to put some sort of disclaimer in there. I'm surprised there wasn't more than that.
[–] MolochHunter 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
consider this:
for the frst time in over half a century at least we have the hard left (anti vaxxers) marching WITH the hard right (constitutionalists) against the establishment
[–] rickki6 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
yahoo wow
[–] bopper 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Well that's interesting..
[–] wayne 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It's just linking a National Review article.
[–] gatoreric [S] 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
exactly, a liberal site linking to a conservative one. And not just any article, but one thoroughly slamming Obamagate and other corruption. In the past they would have written a hit piece challenging it, or called it fake news.
[–] still_winning 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I am very impressed that yahoo linked it. It's a good start.
[–] AndyMan_45 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Be careful with the National Review. That place is run by jonah -------------->goldberg<-----, who I believe is whoopi's sister.
Not on our side.
MAGA
[–] scoripowarrior ago
No, National Review is not a publication I've bothered to read in a very long time. They hate Trump. They are full of elitist delusions.