You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
That's not accurate, actually. The United States has a long standing tradition of amicus curiae briefs. This is a federal case. It may be that no other courts allow this, but Federal courts do. Unfortunately.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] PGLiterati2 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
How is this possible? What rulings/precedents allow this action, anyone?
[–] Qdini [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Reportedly there are none.
[–] PGLiterati2 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Then it will get thrown out. They truly are panicking.
[–] CR302 ago
The SC just ruled last week that Judges couldn't do this. Friends of the court breifings vs prosecutors and defense.
[–] PGLiterati2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Apologies. You are correct--I just found the link here: https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2020/05/13/supreme-court-ruled-unanimously-last-week-against-improper-use-of-amicus-briefs-flynn/
[–] PGLiterati2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's not accurate, actually. The United States has a long standing tradition of amicus curiae briefs. This is a federal case. It may be that no other courts allow this, but Federal courts do. Unfortunately.