You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
0

[–] trenace 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Interesting that people can actually imagine that when secure communications exist as a readily available option -- including sending an envoy to convey major demands, requirements, or agreements in person but many other ways as well, including secure encryption rathe than this stuff -- people like Trump instead communicate withothers via batshit-crazy open-to-any-interpretation bullshit like this.

Which if it were true is NOT secure since you brainiacs so readily "decode" it.

0
0

[–] Justice-Formidious ago 

Yet you watch lamestream media?

1
-1

[–] ZombiClown 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Why would it need to be secure? Actually there is a huge benefit for it to be open source and open to interpretation, which gives it some plausible deniability , I'm not sold on all of these decode type things myself ,there is a subjectivity to it that can go wonky.The fact that you popped in to decry it is humorous though!

1
0

[–] trenace 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Fair enough because I find it quite funny that anyone actually falls for this. So, mutual laughter at the foolishness or alleged foolishness of the other.