You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[+]trenace2 points0 points2 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]trenace2 points
0 points
2 points
(+2|-2)
ago
(edited ago)
Interesting that people can actually imagine that when secure communications exist as a readily available option -- including sending an envoy to convey major demands, requirements, or agreements in person but many other ways as well, including secure encryption rathe than this stuff -- people like Trump instead communicate withothers via batshit-crazy open-to-any-interpretation bullshit like this.
Which if it were true is NOT secure since you brainiacs so readily "decode" it.
Why would it need to be secure? Actually there is a huge benefit for it to be open source and open to interpretation, which gives it some plausible deniability , I'm not sold on all of these decode type things myself ,there is a subjectivity to it that can go wonky.The fact that you popped in to decry it is humorous though!
Fair enough because I find it quite funny that anyone actually falls for this. So, mutual laughter at the foolishness or alleged foolishness of the other.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] trenace 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
Interesting that people can actually imagine that when secure communications exist as a readily available option -- including sending an envoy to convey major demands, requirements, or agreements in person but many other ways as well, including secure encryption rathe than this stuff -- people like Trump instead communicate withothers via batshit-crazy open-to-any-interpretation bullshit like this.
Which if it were true is NOT secure since you brainiacs so readily "decode" it.
[–] Justice-Formidious ago
Yet you watch lamestream media?
[–] ZombiClown 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Why would it need to be secure? Actually there is a huge benefit for it to be open source and open to interpretation, which gives it some plausible deniability , I'm not sold on all of these decode type things myself ,there is a subjectivity to it that can go wonky.The fact that you popped in to decry it is humorous though!
[–] trenace 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Fair enough because I find it quite funny that anyone actually falls for this. So, mutual laughter at the foolishness or alleged foolishness of the other.