You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
It’s like those vitamin c studies used to debunk the greatest chemist ever, Linus Pauling, that used low doses instead of finding the correct high dose as Pauling described. Pauling suggested 2-10 grams depending on the person’s biochemical individuality and the debunking studies used less than one gram. This report is similar. They mention high doses, but then refer to low dosing used for Lupus. I did not see what dose was actually applied, may be wrong here, but it looks like they purposely low dosed so the tests would fail. In another paper, written in about 2005, tests showed you need fairly high dosages.
[+]Awokcanuck0 points1 point1 point
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Awokcanuck0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
They did the same in the early 70's when vitamin B17 was curing a lot of people's cancer.
The Canadian cancer society paid 200,000 for a study at the University of Waterloo when a compound called DCA was shown to reduce a tumor by 70% in 3 weeks.
I have a feeling these people were being monitored on this study.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] TXWYNMTX 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
It’s like those vitamin c studies used to debunk the greatest chemist ever, Linus Pauling, that used low doses instead of finding the correct high dose as Pauling described. Pauling suggested 2-10 grams depending on the person’s biochemical individuality and the debunking studies used less than one gram. This report is similar. They mention high doses, but then refer to low dosing used for Lupus. I did not see what dose was actually applied, may be wrong here, but it looks like they purposely low dosed so the tests would fail. In another paper, written in about 2005, tests showed you need fairly high dosages.
[–] Awokcanuck 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
They did the same in the early 70's when vitamin B17 was curing a lot of people's cancer.
The Canadian cancer society paid 200,000 for a study at the University of Waterloo when a compound called DCA was shown to reduce a tumor by 70% in 3 weeks.
I have a feeling these people were being monitored on this study.
[–] 3Pea_Kabuki3 ago
hope so