I believe this whole thing has been a drill for the real thing to come. With the economic hardships people will be begging for this the next time around. Here is what they have in store for the animals on the farm.
A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection
"The Defense Department is helping to fund a new study to determine whether an under-the-skin biosensor can help trackers keep up — by detecting flu-like infections even before their symptoms begin to show. Its maker, Profusa, says the sensor is on track to try for FDA approval by early next year."
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2020/03/military-funded-biosensor-could-be-future-pandemic-detection/163497/
ID 2020 launches Mark
"Following the completion of v1.0 of ID2020’s Technical Requirements, we are proud to announce the launch of the ID2020 Certification Mark. Both of these efforts reaffirm our mission to improve lives through digital identity by adhering to our core principles of portability, persistence, privacy, and user control."
"Our Certification Mark is the first step in a long process towards achieving “good” digital identity for all."
"The result is a public, fully accessible certification process that serves as one step in a long process towards realizing “good” digital identity for all"
https://medium.com/id2020/id2020-launches-technical-certification-mark-e6743d3f70fd
ID2020: PwC supports efforts to provide a digital identity for everyone on the planet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5P0J-eXUek&feature=emb_logo 2 min video
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Craptacular1029 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
You need to go back and really read Revelation 13:11-18. Not just the parts that you think make your theory make sense. You really gonna ignore the chronological order that the beast rises to power, deceives through seeming miracles, kills those that won't worship him, and THEN forces the mark? What about the part about the mark being specifically in the right hand or forehead? Gonna ignore the part that says he who has wisdom let him count the number for the mark, because it equals 666? I'd love to hear you jump through hoops to try to explain how our massively differing credit scores all somehow add up to 666. Your theory has way too many holes, stop picking and choosing to suit your narrative. Do you even realize that some underdeveloped countries have no such thing as credit scores? Ignorant, you are no biblical scholar by any means.
[–] RobWilJas ago
I have many times. I'm not ignoring anything and I'm not picking and choosing. I understand things differently than you do.
It doesn't "literally" say what you think it does.
I have no interest in arguing with you.
God Bless.
[–] Craptacular1029 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
If you want to make such a bold claim like you've figured out the mark of the beast against others who also study the word, you need to be able to justify how you've arrived at your conclusion. So you're saying some of it is spoken in parables and some not in those verses? So having the number of a man is literal in your interpretation, but the right hand and forehead thing is not? Who's the authority on what is/isn't literal, you?? Your argument still falls apart when it says let him with wisdom calculate the number, Im seeing no wisdom here. Falls apart because you can still obtain and use cash, buy and sell, without anything to do with a credit score. Immigrants do it, less developed countries do it. And what about Rev 14:11 "And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name." So all of those who received a credit rating just by existing, like yourself and I, are already damned? No. You need to reevaluate. The mark will be something you CAN deny, but it may cost your life. Don't make big claims like you've figured out the mark of beast and then only justify it with a "I don't want to argue" and that your theory doesn't have to match exactly 'cause "parables."