You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
There are people that have to be the fall guy. The reason is to set a precedent to go after the dem who did the same thing. They will not prosecute them right away. Barr has aomething bigger for them like rico charges and many more.
That was part of the story from 5 days ago. Here's what was said after that:
The issue then became the sentencing. A new U.S. attorney had just started in Washington D.C. and the week before the filing, he engaged in conversations with senior staff here who raised some questions about the sentencing because he was concerned that the so called guidelines, the sentencing guideline formula, was indicating a sentence between 7 and 9 years.
"Which, he felt and all of us immediately felt was very, very high and excessive in this case."
Repeat...
"and all of us immediately felt was very, very high and excessive.."
Which, he felt and all of us immediately felt was very, very high and excessive in this case. And so he wanted to discuss that and over a number of days it became clear that the prosecution team wanted to recommend to the judge, and by the way, sentencing is a function for the judge and not the Department of Justice, we're not the decision maker. But they wanted to advocate for a sentence that was, at the top, between 7 and 9 years.
And, in those discussions here at the department, you know, I came to the view as my colleagues did that I wouldn't support affirmatively advocating what I thought was an excessive sentence.
So, what I wanted to do what to provide dis -- defer to the discretion of the judge, let the judge make the determination. …
And then point out different features of the case that she should consider if she wanted to go below the 7 to 9 years. And I won't get into the wires on that, but there were a lot of, I think, very legitimate arguments to be raised, there are points to be raised there. But at the end of the day, we deferred to her. ...
Sort: Top
[–] USAMatters 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
WTF - stone was railroaded - the whole foundation of this trial was rigged!!
barr was poppy bush's AG - he would have to be DS to have worked for the evil bushes.
very disappointed with barr.
[–] Oxnonstopox 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
There are people that have to be the fall guy. The reason is to set a precedent to go after the dem who did the same thing. They will not prosecute them right away. Barr has aomething bigger for them like rico charges and many more.
[–] kestrel9 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Again,
Disingenuous OP.
That was part of the story from 5 days ago. Here's what was said after that:
Repeat...