You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] FellowMan 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

And he says it should have cost 2% of that? 2% of 5,000,000,000 is 100,000,000.

What website costs even a hundred million dollars?

0
2

[–] PtCPt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'd interpret that as "in any case, no more than 2%". It is hard to imagine even a $100 million website.

But, it does suggest 98%, as a minimum, was excess, and probably used for something else.

One might think Congress would want to look into that, even back then.

Then, I'd be wondering why it was awarded to a Canadian firm.

0
0

[–] QanadaHere ago 

Because we are owned by ChiComs and Iran in Canada. It likely went straight to the MB