You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Double_D ago  (edited ago)

I've been posing this question lately:

I was told the house's case was "overwhelming" and "irrefutable". If that's the case, why the need for Bolton to testify? If Bolton's testimony is so integral to their case, how did they pass impeachment in the house without it? Am I to believe that the house passed articles with insufficient evidence?

I then go on to tell them that, considering the GOP was barred from calling witnesses in the house, I'd be happy to see them call some in the senate.

Haven't gotten a logical response yet.