0
24

[–] Red_Piller 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

FISA works both ways

0
12

[–] snarkmasterQ 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

yeap, she's a domestic treasonous terrorist so she should be, how cool is that?

0
9

[–] mac1221 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.

I know it is hard to be patient, but we must remember, we are much further ahead with all of this than the rest of the public. But make no mistake, they are waking up and we must give them time to catch up. The traitors receiving justice will depend on the public demanding it. There will be no escape for them at that point.

In the mean time Patriots, we continue in the war of information and waking up as many as we are able. Look at the rallys. MSM can't keep a lid on this much longer. It is becoming exponential at this point. The avalanche is coming. WWG1WGA

0
7

[–] ZippingLou 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

These people are stupid.

0
0

[–] TheRealIndianaJoe ago 

Trump doesn't need FISA for those that work for him. I think this is the reason for the Obama holdovers. Your boss does not need a warrant to observe your work.

0
10

[–] greatheart 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

How can her movements be monitored? I thought the shills were saying nothing is happening.

Just because it is not out in public does not mean it is not happening. Trust the plan.

0
3

[–] mac1221 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I could not agree with you more. The tip of the news iceberg we are getting has been increasing and coming on many different fronts. There are more of us than there are of them.

They are not going to be able to continue fighting on so many fronts. This too is strategic. They are going to start focusing their efforts in a couple of areas because this is all they can do. We have already been witnessing them maneuver to protect their butts by throwing each other under the bus.

It is coming.

0
4

[–] Qd4Action 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm sorry but after reading the Axios story, I'm struck with a nagging 'so fucking what?' question. So she was monitored? If she was corrupt or if POTUS/DOJ believed she might be corrupt and engaged in facilitating aid dollars being funneled to Hungary for laundering through banks before being sent back to Ukraine for disbursement to businesses that routed funds into US politicians' pockets or campaign chests...she should have been monitored.

It's called looking into corruption and she is being monitored because she is believed to be a central figure in the corruption...and maybe a reason that she is no longer the US Ambassador to Ukraine. So fucking what? How is this a problem? She's part of the State Department and she can be replaced by POTUS at any time - she serves at his pleasure.

Guiliani is involved because POTUS doesn't trust the FBI, CIA or anyone at the State Department for good fucking reason (see: Russiagate).

So what's the fucking problem, Democrats? Butt hurt because you lost your corrupt insider in Ukraine?

0
4

[–] Johnny_Ninja 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Guys. Trump is an art of war kinda guy. Remember the one about "winning the battle before it even begins"? Of course the bitch was monitored..and so much more. Why do you think he wants a senate trial so badly?

0
4

[–] baccachew75 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

What are the implications of this?

1
2

[–] DickTick 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

The left is acting like the Parnas papers are a slam dunk for them. Not that we haven't heard that a thousand times, but still.

0
4

[–] TraitorsOnARope 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Those idiot fucks think EVERYTHING is a slam dunk for them.

0
2

[–] PGLiterati2 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Oh, this is Chris Steele Part II. Lev Parnas and the dems have released it.

0
1

[–] YESIMASHILL 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Aren't they all monitored

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)