It's apprarent to me know. They watned another Benghazi where they storm, kill and take over the embassy. Only this time, it didn't happen. Rather than standby and pretend nothing happened, a response was made a an Iranian (Fixed) General was killed. What exactly did they expect to happen?
1) They attacked
2) We responded
3) Iraqi General dead
It's funny since the media wants us to believe that the Iraqi plans retaliation. But how can you plan retaliation when they provoked an attack on an embassy. This is the same as a bully making fun of a kid. the kid pushes back and the bully cries fowl or hurts the kid who originally didn't do anything wrong other than defending him/herself.
Not only that but the Generals visit at the WH makes me wonder if he was an DS operative getting inside intelligence or working against this country. Not to mention his daughter being used as a backdoor somehow due to citizenship.
I also find it puzzling that trump kills one guy, deservably so, but no one says anything when Obama did much worse due to the number of bombings and killings. But hey that's ok, no foul right?
The whole thing stinks.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] OregonAngel2 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What they really wanted was a hostage situation so they could milk the mainstream media attention for months. It would have been the ultimate distraction from the exposure of Deep State crimes. It would also have been a replay of the Iranian embassy hostage situation that President Trump refers to in his list of 52 targets.