Vaccine SHedding
vaccine shedding breaks their narrative. If you vaccinate someone, and then THEY infect the UNVACCINATED, well there goes your "herd immunity" hypothesis. RIGHT OUT THE DOOR
It would turn out that the MORE people are vaccinated, the greater chance for unvaccinated to become infected because of vaccine shedding, which means that herd immunity is false....since it can only be ONE or the OTHER
They dun GOOFD
Herd Immunity vs Vaccine Shedding--which is more true?
If what I'm saying is true (a scenario outlined below), it would turn out this herd immunity hypothesis is just MASS GASLIGHTING
Because if you have a
- Population A that is unvaccinated
- And Population B that is HALF vaccinated
Then the presumption under HERD IMMUNITY (* a Hypothesis btw) is that Population A would have a higher rate of disease than Population B, because population B has a number of people that are essentially immune to being 'vectors'.
However, because of vaccine shedding, it could be the case (we don't know) that a number of folks between 0 and 50% could become infected, and of the other 50% that were vaccinated, a small number WILL DEVELOP THE INFECTION, as we've seen with the polio vaccine
This number, whatever it is could be higher than in population A, the unvaccinated. Because you are introducing the virus into the population, and we don't know the rate of vaccine shedding
We just have to rely on wikipedia saying "RARE EVENT". We need to know the rates. We MUST know otherwise we ought not implement any MANDATORY vaccine programs. And I'll tell you why
Vaccination as propaganda
Because of vaccine shedding, if the rate is sufficiently higher so that population B has a higher rate of infection than population A, then the vaccination "Herd Immunity" hypothesis is FAKE NEWS SCARE PROPAGANDA, to SCARE populations into vaccinating their kids. And as we know, these vaccines could be anything.
But even if the vaccines were "pure and true" and didn't have other agents that cause problems (in other words, they were simply 'vanilla' vaccines without dangerous adjuvants, cancer agents or tracking nanotech devices), it would STILL be an anticompetitive "protection racket" run by the pharma corporations with promotional, administrative, and enforcement pressures sponsored by the government.
Truly nasty stuff.
We demand answers on "Vaccine Shedding". We have real questions about this issue, and aren't just shilling for the "Big Homeschooling Industrial Complex" that doesn't exist
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ghost_of_aswartz [S] 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
They won't disappear me. I'm too low level for them to worry about. Besides, when I blipped their radar, they already tried to get rid of me and they failed (twice), and each time they try and fail, the universe is oriented to make each successive attempt a multiplier more difficult. I was targetted already for creating, working on, and trying to get funding for a crowdsourced lobbying app that threatened to disintermediate their regulatory capture and racketeering power circles in DC . They threatened to kill me 20 times on reddit and I have screenshots of this and sent them already to the WH when they asked the public for examples of conservative censorship evidences last yr
they put my reddit username on a video with about 30 others that they scrolled with ominous music over a blurred out image of the united grand lodge of england (freedmasonry) as a 'death threat' meant to intimidate. It failed.
It will always fail. I cannot be intimidated, but again, I'm a nothingberger with no active threats against them so they really don't care