11/14/19 07:39:27 PM EST Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
AUS, IT, UK co-op DOJ (Barr, Durham, CLAS 1-4)
HUMINT, SIGINT, etc.
Non_FVEY official chan [US senior person(s) req given sensitive nature of 'target' re: presidential nominee(s) - POTUS + Cruz [CLAS 1-4]]
Who gave the order(s)?
Who signed?
Papered per normal NATSEC?
Comms to/from F + Domestic?
F2F 1-4 US person(s) initiate scope memo.
US AMB 1 & 2 NSA unmask req.
NSA > US AMB 1 & 2 > AUS, IT, UK
[special order per DIR [CLAS 1-9] AUTH unmask per US AMB]
[EACH UNMASKING REQUIRES APPROVAL / SIGN ['KEY']]
C_A domestic assist w/ rogue FBI to avoid US law [non_op domestic]?
C_A HUMINT domestic placement > T campaign [1-3 jumps primary target], T WH spy_insertion NATSEC C, personal advisor(s), cabinet?
C_A organized under DNI?
2010 - 2017 [Clapper] [bulk]
2017 - 2019 [Coats] [sleeper/prevent [black op] release of incriminating docs]
Q
view the rest of the comments →
[–] mrhawley2 ago
Does this mean we are getting another delay?
[–] MeanoReno 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Actually, rather than infer a delay, it seems to be a primer on info that will be coming out.
[–] KarlKastner [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's how I read it.
[–] mrhawley2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks. after reading a couple times i see that. it was just initial thought.
[–] MeanoReno 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Where do you get a delay from the drop, it states nothing to infer a delay.
[–] mrhawley2 ago
Maybe i just read it wrong.