The information and research here is not about chemical reactions, but atomic level reactions. It includes patents, video proof, and debunks the misinformation being put out by others like ae911truth.org. The simplest explanation is usually the truth. There was no exotic thermite, jet fuel, explosives, etc that destroyed over 100 stories of steel, office furniture, huge concrete steel reinforced floors, etc. EVERTHING was turned to dust by simply striking the target with mass. That mass was neutrons produced by a 4th generation nuclear fusion reaction. No big explosions, no fire... simply the production of neutron's. The future energy was available years ago. The patents where created years ago. The tech was used on the towers.
https://twitter.com/paulmuaddib61/status/1187020428943990786
http://thereal911report.com/
view the rest of the comments →
[–] justjakk [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Judy shows only that everthing turned to dust. I saw nothing in her videos that explains HOW that happened. Only that it DID happen.
[–] ZombiClown ago
I agree, the explanation by DR wood and this narrative are the same, although some of the this narrative is contradictory , I.E the damage that occurred blocks away. its contradicts the idea that somehow it was a reaction to something contained IN or close to the building.
[–] justjakk [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I've read about 95% of Pauls research. He has EVERY doubt covered. Those cars along the street looked 200 years old. In 2 videos plus a scientific "experiment" video, you can plainly see that the live video taken by reporters on the ground, was being hit by radiation particles. The live vids exactly mimic "tests" conducted on the affects of radiation on video camera's. So NO. it is NOT contradictory. The radiation was being carried by the pyroclastic cloud which destroyed the cars/etc.