You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] justjakk [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Judy shows only that everthing turned to dust. I saw nothing in her videos that explains HOW that happened. Only that it DID happen.

0
0

[–] ZombiClown ago 

I agree, the explanation by DR wood and this narrative are the same, although some of the this narrative is contradictory , I.E the damage that occurred blocks away. its contradicts the idea that somehow it was a reaction to something contained IN or close to the building.

0
1

[–] justjakk [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I've read about 95% of Pauls research. He has EVERY doubt covered. Those cars along the street looked 200 years old. In 2 videos plus a scientific "experiment" video, you can plainly see that the live video taken by reporters on the ground, was being hit by radiation particles. The live vids exactly mimic "tests" conducted on the affects of radiation on video camera's. So NO. it is NOT contradictory. The radiation was being carried by the pyroclastic cloud which destroyed the cars/etc.