You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
I think it is possible to a) be conservative and b) be for legal immigration. I know Kirk has had a lot of negative feedback for this position but I think it is important to remember that America has always been pro-immigration. If you look back historically on times where there was a lot of anti-immigration sentiment, it was typically when Americans felt that immigrants were being imported specifically to undercut their wages--and they were correct in that anger. Note Kirk states that he is for supporting immigrants who can contribute to our society--and that is not the same thing. So, until I see something more convincing I will not be thinking he is pro Open Borders, or Soros backed. Good to question all voices but we also don't want to be pushing out advocates we share the cause with.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] PGLiterati 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I think it is possible to a) be conservative and b) be for legal immigration. I know Kirk has had a lot of negative feedback for this position but I think it is important to remember that America has always been pro-immigration. If you look back historically on times where there was a lot of anti-immigration sentiment, it was typically when Americans felt that immigrants were being imported specifically to undercut their wages--and they were correct in that anger. Note Kirk states that he is for supporting immigrants who can contribute to our society--and that is not the same thing. So, until I see something more convincing I will not be thinking he is pro Open Borders, or Soros backed. Good to question all voices but we also don't want to be pushing out advocates we share the cause with.