You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
People attempting to forum slide and disrupt this board in contravention of Q's call for unity through patriotism may be banned
What is Q related? Anything involving Trump. Politics, Fake news, Censorship, Pizzagate, lluminati, New World Order, Secret Societies, Mk-Ultra, False Flags, Q proofs, etc...
Also, corruption in the following areas...
Government, Entertainment industry, celebrities, charities, corporations, etc...
No Pornographic Material Allowed
Continually harassing users can get your post/comment removed and you possibly banned. Threats of violence against other users or their family members are not allowed on v/GreatAwakening
Those belong in the comment section. If you need help, you can ping a mod, or PM us.
Posts need to be Q related. Not for attacking other users.
GAM is the new place for all things drama/mods/other users pertaining to v/GreatAwakening.
No usernames imitating mods
Misc reasons
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead.
In my scenario:
the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and is met by the whole family each pointing a AR15 holding 100 rounds at him. The man backs off.
We are on the SAME side, and I agree with you from a strategic point of view entirely, as the response you portray is ideal.
The point I was making however was simply that the raw number of weapons, in and of itself, is an insufficient indicator of killing power.
Russia + China + Iran + NK have sufficient power, when employing a 'special teams' scenario such as 9/11 but on a larger scale to shake the very foundation of the US
Do I want this? No
My point is merely that, as originally stated, POTUS is a gift from God, one that is temporary and not yet final in terms of the victory over evil
Evil will have its hour, however brief it may be relative to eternity
view the rest of the comments →
[–] TSE [S] ago
Your analysis fails for the following reason.
In your scenario:
the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead.
In my scenario:
the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and is met by the whole family each pointing a AR15 holding 100 rounds at him. The man backs off.
[–] Runspotrun 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
We are on the SAME side, and I agree with you from a strategic point of view entirely, as the response you portray is ideal.
The point I was making however was simply that the raw number of weapons, in and of itself, is an insufficient indicator of killing power.
Russia + China + Iran + NK have sufficient power, when employing a 'special teams' scenario such as 9/11 but on a larger scale to shake the very foundation of the US
Do I want this? No
My point is merely that, as originally stated, POTUS is a gift from God, one that is temporary and not yet final in terms of the victory over evil
Evil will have its hour, however brief it may be relative to eternity