You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] TSE [S] ago 

Your analysis fails for the following reason.

In your scenario:

the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead.

In my scenario:

the man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and is met by the whole family each pointing a AR15 holding 100 rounds at him. The man backs off.

0
1

[–] Runspotrun 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We are on the SAME side, and I agree with you from a strategic point of view entirely, as the response you portray is ideal.

The point I was making however was simply that the raw number of weapons, in and of itself, is an insufficient indicator of killing power.

Russia + China + Iran + NK have sufficient power, when employing a 'special teams' scenario such as 9/11 but on a larger scale to shake the very foundation of the US

Do I want this? No

My point is merely that, as originally stated, POTUS is a gift from God, one that is temporary and not yet final in terms of the victory over evil

Evil will have its hour, however brief it may be relative to eternity